sorry it was a bit mistakeArty wrote:No, nothing like that. Why did you say "+1" if you have no clue of how it works?Meis2M wrote:is it like wordpress template?
im happy
"The work has been done on subsilver so we should keep it"
sorry it was a bit mistakeArty wrote:No, nothing like that. Why did you say "+1" if you have no clue of how it works?Meis2M wrote:is it like wordpress template?
"The work has been done on subsilver so we should keep it"
I don't think that was actually one of the reasons we kept it. I think the reason we kept it was because users wanted to keep it.RMcGirr83 wrote:Hmmm, I sort of recall that this reasoning was used to retain subsilver2. Paraphrase "The work has been done on subsilver so we should keep it".Work has and always will not get used. Its how development works. Because work has been done on something doesn't mean we shouldn't use a better solution.
Please don't take it out of context.RMcGirr83 wrote:Hmmm, I sort of recall that this reasoning was used to retain subsilver2. Paraphrase "The work has been done on subsilver so we should keep it".Work has and always will not get used. Its how development works. Because work has been done on something doesn't mean we shouldn't use a better solution.
Whilst I agree, you can't have 30 developers all working on 2 things.One Nils wants to do himself; the other is already being worked on by 4 people? Blockers come first but other development shouldn't be halted. That would just waste of both time and resources. And there is no point saying lets work on this for 3.2. We have no idea which it will go in. Depends how long it takes and how long it takes to complete the blockers which it will go in.On topic, I don't think we need to make such a major change for 3.1. Let's get the blockers done and get an alpha release out. We can work on this for 3.2.
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
+1 for this.imkingdavid wrote: On topic, I don't think we need to make such a major change for 3.1. Let's get the blockers done and get an alpha release out. We can work on this for 3.2.
It does - twig extensions.Oleg wrote:Any proposal replacing the template engine would have to address all of extensions/events needs. Including the ones that the current template engine does not address.
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"