[RFC] Include mobile style

Note: We are moving the topics of this forum and it will be deleted at some point

Publish your own request for comments/change or patches for the next version of phpBB. Discuss the contributions and proposals of others. Upcoming releases are 3.2/Rhea and 3.3.
Post Reply
User avatar
Jacob
Registered User
Posts: 102
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: [RFC] Include mobile style

Post by Jacob »

Unknown Bliss wrote:After a recent website team meeting [whilst discussing this as it's being developed by the website team] it was pointed out that it is better to have a mobile style with JS than no mobile style. If the mobile doesn't have JS then it will automatically revert back to prosilver. The majority of mobile devices support JS anyway.
Seems ok to me.
Top
User avatar
emosbat
Registered User
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:49 am

Re: [RFC] Include mobile style

Post by emosbat »

why do not use tapatak? they support phpBB
Top
User avatar
DavidIQ
Customisations Team Leader
Customisations Team Leader
Posts: 1904
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:
Contact DavidIQ

Re: [RFC] Include mobile style

Post by DavidIQ »

For starters because the TapaTalk app costs money.
Image
Top
User avatar
MichaelC
Development Team
Development Team
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:29 pm

Re: [RFC] Include mobile style

Post by MichaelC »

emosbat wrote:why do not use tapatak? they support phpBB
And thats an app, it should be viewable in a mobile browser.
Formerly known as Unknown Bliss
psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “[3.x][Archive] RFCs”