That's not true. All posts must be reevaluated from BBCode source. The way the system I'm making stores is imcompatible with the way the current system stores.EXreaction wrote:That could only happen if they upgrade and someone edits the post after the upgrade.
Please do, if BBCode is being misused and generating wrong HTML it will be blown by my implementation.imkingdavid wrote: Well, we should at least prep the Support team for support requests about parts of a post not being displayed anymore.
Don't worry I'm making more and remaking the existing one.JoshyPHP wrote:By the way, are there any existing tests for the current engine? All I see is one test intests/bbcode/parser_test.php
and a few cases intests/bbcode/url_bbcode_test.php
. I've looked into master and develop.
I just need to understand first how to make it working with as minimal resources as possible and without any errors.
For now, what I'm really interested in is to make what I think that a BBCode parser should have/be and to solve all the bugs pointed out in the tickets that are associated to this BBCode's ticket. If you want to, for me, feel free to do that.JoshyPHP wrote:Ok, thanks. It would be nice if someone was able to compile a list of desirable characteristics, if not specs, for the current engine or future solution. It would be even better to sort them out as "essentials" (e.g. "needs to allow custom BBCodes"), "nice-to-haves", and perhaps even features that could be phased out such as per-style custom BBCode templates.
Yeah! That could be useful.JoshyPHP wrote: Perhaps the fine people over at the 3.0.x Support Forum could chime in with the most common grievance about phpBB's BBCodes, or about the whole text formatting for that matter? MOD authors such as the authors of Advanced BBCode Box 3 may have some valuable input as well.