Discussion of general topics related to the new version and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
Forum rules
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
I suppose the developers made some kind of research before making their choice, comparing the amount of energy spent by the users using the prev/next links and the ones using the click-back-click (IE6 philosophy) or midclick-close-midclick (decent browser philosophy), and found out that the removal of those links would have caused the ascent of entropy to decrease by at least 0.00015 microjoules/sec, so letting the universe persist for as much as 0.005 secs longer.
phpBB is entropy-friendly.
(I should stop reading Stephen Hawking, I know.)
Finally something intelligent on Area51! I thank you 8)
Style: subBlack (Now updated to phpBB 2.0.22 and 5 new color schemes!)
I suppose the developers made some kind of research before making their choice, comparing the amount of energy spent by the users using the prev/next links and the ones using the click-back-click (IE6 philosophy) or midclick-close-midclick (decent browser philosophy), and found out that the removal of those links would have caused the ascent of entropy to decrease by at least 0.00015 microjoules/sec, so letting the universe persist for as much as 0.005 secs longer.
phpBB is entropy-friendly.
(I should stop reading Stephen Hawking, I know.)
8O You lost me after the thirteenth word. 8O
Thirteen? I didn't even last that long… probably after the third or fourth.
My phpBB3 Mods || My Mod Queue Search Engine Friendly (SEO) URLs || Profile link on Avatar and/or Username || AJAX Chat
Display Posts Anywhere || CashMod || AJAX Quick Edit || AJAX Quick Reply
But why... would the universe last longer, when we use less energy?
I mean... either way the energy does not cease to exist. It's just somewhere else.
But you might consider this Off-Topic
EvilNui wrote:
But why... would the universe last longer, when we use less energy?
I mean... either way the energy does not cease to exist. It's just somewhere else.
But you might consider this Off-Topic
Boy, we sure get into a lot of rat-holes, don't we?
A successful community begins with YOU. Tag, you're it.
ok… i"M a little less tired this morning and I got through the entire thing… I understood it but I didn't.
Is it about using less server energy? by microns?
Energy is limitless/endless… if only they could figure out how to make it without polluting the daylights out of everything.
My phpBB3 Mods || My Mod Queue Search Engine Friendly (SEO) URLs || Profile link on Avatar and/or Username || AJAX Chat
Display Posts Anywhere || CashMod || AJAX Quick Edit || AJAX Quick Reply
Fountain of Apples wrote:
Boy, we sure get into a lot of rat-holes, don't we?
what?
Handyman wrote:
Is it about using less server energy? by microns?
I think it is about us, the users, wasting less energy on clicking.
Handyman wrote:
Energy is limitless/endless… if only they could figure out how to make it without polluting the daylights out of everything.
Energy must have a limit! That limit is just not within our reach ... yet .
Humanity is considering money to be more important than our planet. And using other energy ressources would be more expensive right now.