Quick reply
Forum rules
Discuss features as they are added to the new version. Give us your feedback. Don't post bug reports, feature requests, support questions or suggestions here. Feature requests are closed.
Discuss features as they are added to the new version. Give us your feedback. Don't post bug reports, feature requests, support questions or suggestions here. Feature requests are closed.
Quick reply
Will it be included in the new features? It's probably *the* most used phpBB mod, and someone just had to ask about it at least once...
Re: Quick reply
As I've said elsewhere, no it won't be included in 2.2.x ... I've checked with the physicists and been reliably informed that the world will not stop turning and the sky will not fall due to my decision.
Many features useful to admins/users are being included but frankly I view "quickreply" as being "quickspam" and "quick-how-to-implement-something-which-appeals-to-everyone-without-it-actually-being-a-pain-in-the-arse-reply". I'm sure several Mods will appear implementing various types of "quickreply" and thus users can add whichever version they prefer.
Many features useful to admins/users are being included but frankly I view "quickreply" as being "quickspam" and "quick-how-to-implement-something-which-appeals-to-everyone-without-it-actually-being-a-pain-in-the-arse-reply". I'm sure several Mods will appear implementing various types of "quickreply" and thus users can add whichever version they prefer.
Re: Quick reply
Ok, thanks for the reply. So... Earth won't stop turning, eh? Well, that reassures me 
Re: Quick reply
Now I didn't say the Earth won't stop turning. I merely said the world will not stop turning due to my decision
I can make no promises with regard strange gravitational effects or other phenomena.
Re: Quick reply
lol someone should change the announcements or the rules to have in big bold text
'there will be no quick reply out of the box in 2.2"

'there will be no quick reply out of the box in 2.2"
Re: Quick reply
Bah, I'm sure someone will have such a mod ready by day 2 
Re: Quick reply
Agreed, definitively : a forum - hopefully - is not a tchat.psoTFX wrote:(../..)frankly I view "quickreply" as being "quickspam" and "quick-how-to-implement-something-which-appeals-to-everyone-without-it-actually-being-a-pain-in-the-arse-reply".(../..)
What about a "force preview" at contrary, to force people to re-read what they've wrote : did you sat your mind on ?
- A_Jelly_Doughnut
- Registered User
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:23 pm
Re: Quick reply
If not beforeBarren wrote:Bah, I'm sure someone will have such a mod ready by day 2![]()
A_Jelly_Doughnut
Re: Quick reply
Or get creative, start making your own Quick Reply Mod!Barren wrote:Bah, I'm sure someone will have such a mod ready by day 2![]()
-
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 10:58 pm
- Location: Girona, Catalunya (Spain)
- Contact:
Re: Quick reply
Well, I was planning to create Quick Reply MOD based on DHTML, so it will only work for browsers with javascript enabled, making it difficult to use for automated robots.
I already made several DHTML related MODs and Joe Belmaati suggested me to do that via PM. I found the idea really funny. So, when I find the time, I will...
I already made several DHTML related MODs and Joe Belmaati suggested me to do that via PM. I found the idea really funny. So, when I find the time, I will...