version 2 still appropriate for phpBB ?

[Ptirhiik_]

I was thinking of this : the phpBB 2.1 has really nothing to deal with phpBB 2.0 now : all the code has been rework, and there will be no compliancy with previous mods or add-ons because of many points : the templates have been renamed, the auth system and posting/publication process dramaticely extended, so the board performances, data structures changed, and so.

In other words, it is no more the same product than phpBB 2.0.x : wouldn't it be appropriate to name it 3.0.0 at released time ?

[psoTFX]

erm, no, because not all the code has been reworked ... thanks, but we're sticking with 2.2.

[Roberdin]

They're not AOL you know

[coolio]

They're not AOL you know

good one

[mantako]

lol @ Roberdin

[mercifull]

heheh 'phpBB 2004'

2.2 sounds cool to me tho it does seem more like an upgrade to current 2.0.x versions than totally new board software.

[Trek]

phpBB 2004, sounds more like a M$ numbering scheme, with Windows/Office 2000, and 2003 :)

[Roberdin]

They've been trying to drop the year since they released Windows XP, although curiously, they still have Windows Server 2003.

[DoD]

Hmmmm...

even though its most been re-written, its actually, just additional features.

[modenaf1]

phpbb xp lol


im fine with 2.1 and 2.2 and stuff. But whoa it does feel like maybe a 3.0 hehehe this is so awsome. Good thing I decided to register an account lol