START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
- Contact:
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
OK, got it.
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
Just got back from vacation and this topic was brought to my attention. I have some other things to attend to but will weighin as soon as I can.
-Nuttzy
-Nuttzy
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
For those watching this
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=222147" target="_blank
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=222147" target="_blank
Eric
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
- Contact:
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
Okay. It's good to finally get a formal answer. (Though why Nuttzy's MODs can be EMC, I still don't know (don't answer that!))
- A_Jelly_Doughnut
- Registered User
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:23 pm
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
IIRC the copies of the MODs that come with EasyMOD are "EMC", but the ones in the phpbb.com MOD database are not. Could be wrong
A_Jelly_Doughnut
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
- Contact:
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
As of EasyMOD 0.1.13 Beta 1, 2 MODs come with EasyMOD, which are Country Flags MOD and SpellingCow. Both are Nuttzy's MODs, and are therefore "deemed" EasyMOD Compliant, the reason being that he is writing the standards. Why he is allowed to have his MODs be EMC we'll never know (don't answer that).
- A_Jelly_Doughnut
- Registered User
- Posts: 1780
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 4:23 pm
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
MOD Team standards don't apply to things outside the phpBB.com MOD-Database. Nuttzy could use a MOD-Template from Mars in the MODs with EasyMOD, but that would make it more work for him to be in the MOD-DB.
A_Jelly_Doughnut
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
Maybe is it time to stop the funny trolling ? (don't answer that neither) A better usage of this lost of time would be to contribute in the enhancment and progress of the EMC standard definition, don't you think ?
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
- Contact:
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
That depends...Nuttzy is the only one writing them
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:30 am
- Location: SF Bay Area, CA, USA
- Contact:
Re: START HERE - EasyMOD Compliance Standards
Basically, the reason why I object to Nuttzy's getting to deem his MODs EMC is because, like what has been said above, they really aren't. I tried installing one of Nuttzy's EMC MODs, SpellingCow, on a board withh over 100 MODs installed with EM, and it didn't install, due to a Fatal Error. Then, I tried installing another MOD found in the MODs Database which wasn't EMC, and it installed perfectly.
That's basically the only reason I objected, because if there is no such thing as EMC, that would be okay except that there are MODs that are being deemed EMC when there is no such thing as EMC, according to the MOD Authors.
That's basically the only reason I objected, because if there is no such thing as EMC, that would be okay except that there are MODs that are being deemed EMC when there is no such thing as EMC, according to the MOD Authors.