well itst,
I really agreed with you, since a pe ruser rating is *bad* and a per post rating is *better*, but you are quite telling phpbb cannot support both !
well, people still can get a karma when his posts are rated...
and in UCP, have a:
hide posts of people having less than [XX] karma.
hide posts having less than [XX] votes karma.
so that admin, and even people can make phpbb really fit their need.
New karma post...
Forum rules
Discuss features as they are added to the new version. Give us your feedback. Don't post bug reports, feature requests, support questions or suggestions here. Feature requests are closed.
Discuss features as they are added to the new version. Give us your feedback. Don't post bug reports, feature requests, support questions or suggestions here. Feature requests are closed.
- mansuetus
- Registered User
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 8:02 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
Re: New karma post...
Petite publicité pour mon site : on présente des horoscopes qui tuent, on propose des tests,
et si tu cherches bien, tu verras même un phpBB
viens sur spontex.org !
et si tu cherches bien, tu verras même un phpBB
viens sur spontex.org !
- mansuetus
- Registered User
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 8:02 pm
- Location: Paris, France
- Contact:
Re: New karma post...
well, feature...
if it do not become one, I would mod it ! (well, ... try too, at least :p )
if it do not become one, I would mod it ! (well, ... try too, at least :p )
Petite publicité pour mon site : on présente des horoscopes qui tuent, on propose des tests,
et si tu cherches bien, tu verras même un phpBB
viens sur spontex.org !
et si tu cherches bien, tu verras même un phpBB
viens sur spontex.org !
Re: New karma post...
Instead of hiding posts, why not just sort posts by a scoring system? Something along the lines of:
w variables are weights
days old * w1 + poster karma * w2 + post karma * w3
(just a rough example)
And if you are worried about increase cpu usage during listing of the posts, why not just cache the values, and make only the poster's karma at the time he/she posted it count.
w variables are weights
days old * w1 + poster karma * w2 + post karma * w3
(just a rough example)
And if you are worried about increase cpu usage during listing of the posts, why not just cache the values, and make only the poster's karma at the time he/she posted it count.
- coolio
- Registered User
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2003 9:27 pm
- Location: Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing, Testing
Re: New karma post...
I dont know why you all debate it: if you don't like it, disable it!
phpBB rocks the world
Download a CVS version of phpBB 2.2 (unsupported)
Sourceforge request tracker
Forum search tool
Download a CVS version of phpBB 2.2 (unsupported)
Sourceforge request tracker
Forum search tool
Re: New karma post...
Easy said Coolio but I think most people would begrudge a feature if it means extra processing for something they don't use. If I turn off 20 features I don't really want those 20 IF statements or whatever running anyway to check that I've done it.coolio wrote:I dont know why you all debate it: if you don't like it, disable it!
I think that's the reason why phpBB doesn't have every feature under the sun, the processing would kill the software. vBulletin is a good example of what can happen if you put more features than scripting into a board, unless you set it up very carefully it runs pretty slow compared to others
Images in sigs! please.
Re: New karma post...
The if statements are usually simple true/false comparisons. The load difference introduced by these comparisons is quite neglible.
Re: New karma post...
Scale that up to several hundred and remember this is a runtime interpreted language
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2001 4:06 pm
- Location: space... that which matter occupies
- Contact:
Re: New karma post...
Yes, load intensity can get higher, especially if you're looking at post karma, and then you've got database load and size. A suggestion would be to have both options available as parts of the same system (like the weighting with the option of enabling/disabling different components) but then the load increases yet again... and is it worth sacrificing this load on all the phpBB installations, or is it more worth creating a mod which can be used by those who want it? I would suggest that user/poster karma should not be included in the base installation at all and that it should be a mod itself. I mean, if you're having karma, why not the points mod, etc.
Another 2c
Another 2c
Sj26
*does a little dance, makes a little love, praises the UCP*
Umm... I can't change my e-mail address
*does a little dance, makes a little love, praises the UCP*
Umm... I can't change my e-mail address