[RFC] LESS CSS
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
+1 for some sort of advanced CSS preprocessor, however theeir are many and if you are talking about using it o the backend I would be more inclined to use sass as its ruby based, far more powerful, and with compass included extremely extensive but by the time 4.0 comes around their would most likely be lots of these floating around
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
There's no guarantee that a server that runs php will run ruby so... Bad idea dude.hanakin wrote:I would be more inclined to use sass as its ruby based, far more powerful,
- callumacrae
- Former Team Member
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
SASS is nice, but I prefer LESS.hanakin wrote:+1 for some sort of advanced CSS preprocessor, however theeir are many and if you are talking about using it o the backend I would be more inclined to use sass as its ruby based, far more powerful, and with compass included extremely extensive but by the time 4.0 comes around their would most likely be lots of these floating around
For the record, there are SASS parsers available for PHP.
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
point was i would prefer it not that it should be, as call pointed out can run it through php but where available can utilize ruby any way most servers professional servers these days have ruby exspecially if they are linux basedbrunoais wrote:There's no guarantee that a server that runs php will run ruby so... Bad idea dude.hanakin wrote:I would be more inclined to use sass as its ruby based, far more powerful,
- callumacrae
- Former Team Member
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
-1, even if it is available, Ruby should not be used. phpBB should use only PHP, server-side.hanakin wrote:point was i would prefer it not that it should be, as call pointed out can run it through php but where available can utilize ruby any way most servers professional servers these days have ruby exspecially if they are linux basedbrunoais wrote:There's no guarantee that a server that runs php will run ruby so... Bad idea dude.hanakin wrote:I would be more inclined to use sass as its ruby based, far more powerful,
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
An article about Sass vs Stylus vs LESS.
Formerly known as Unknown Bliss
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
- callumacrae
- Former Team Member
- Posts: 1046
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 am
- Location: England
- Contact:
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
The differences between the languages are purely down to personal preference (I personally prefer LESS, but probably just because I'm used to it), but the LESS CSS compiler for PHP is far superior to any Sass compiler I have seen (there isn't really any one big one, just tonnes of smaller ones).Unknown Bliss wrote:An article about Sass vs Stylus vs LESS.
How about making a thread in the style authors forum nearer the time? I'd be happy to make it
-1 @ Stylus; I just don't like some things it does.
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
+1 for LESS
+0 for Sass -> Not bad but still... not exactly my style.
-1 for Stylus -> I don't like the way it works.
+0 for Sass -> Not bad but still... not exactly my style.
-1 for Stylus -> I don't like the way it works.
Re: [RFC] LESS CSS
+1 for LESS
In fact, is it fair to ask users to learn Symfony? LESS is pretty like CSS - in addition, you can simply use just CSS, LESS compiler will just ignore it. And it will rapidly speed up styling when used.VSE+ wrote:My 2 cents: Use LESS to build the CSS during development. However, compile it and distribute the compiled CSS with phpBB 4.
It isn't fair to ask users to learn yet another coding language.