Note: We are moving the topics of this forum and it will be deleted at some point
Publish your own request for comments/change or patches for the next version of phpBB. Discuss the contributions and proposals of others. Upcoming releases are 3.2/Rhea and 3.3.
brunoais wrote:We should just stop supporting subsilver2, not make it disappear from the internet or the current forums.
subsilver should just be deactivated and can be activated by board admins if they want to. Just don't expect that subsilver2 will ever be kept updated. Someone has to do that job and it's not the phpbb dev members.
We're talking about upgrading from 3.1 to 3.2. people using subsilver2 might not be able to use 3.2, to some extent, because of the changes in template that won't be applied.
But then again I suppose I agree.. we cannot just force the removal of subsilver2 where it's already installed. Never mind then.
I do custom MODs. PM for a quote! View My: MODs | Portfolio Please do NOT contact for support via PM or email.
Remember, the enemy's gate is down.
brunoais wrote:We should just stop supporting subsilver2, not make it disappear from the internet or the current forums.
subsilver should just be deactivated and can be activated by board admins if they want to. Just don't expect that subsilver2 will ever be kept updated. Someone has to do that job and it's not the phpbb dev members.
Thats the plan, as soon as a develop branch for 3.2 is made, sub silver will be removed and no further updates made to it.
Last edited by imkingdavid on Fri Feb 17, 2012 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason:fixed quote tags
Formerly known as Unknown Bliss
psoTFX wrote:
I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
Ger wrote:Why not use subsilver3? Based on prosilver.
Because that defeats the purpose of having subsilver2. It's not just about keeping the look. It's also about the underlying HTML used (subsilver2 uses tables). It wouldn't make sense for us to include a prosilver-based subsilver either.
Ger wrote:Why not use subsilver3? Based on prosilver.
Because that defeats the purpose of having subsilver2. It's not just about keeping the look. It's also about the underlying HTML used (subsilver2 uses tables). It wouldn't make sense for us to include a prosilver-based subsilver either.
+1
But all that said I agree you have to stop supporting the subsilver2
