Also you could add another folder, template/mod/ like you have in the language/en/ folder to try to have modders use the mod/ folder instead of dumping it in with the rest.
phpBB 3.2 Discussion
Forum rules
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
- EXreaction
- Registered User
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 2:15 am
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
Sounds good, but could you maybe move the mcp template files to template/mcp/ and the ucp files to template/ucp/? That would make working with templates much easier I think. 
Also you could add another folder, template/mod/ like you have in the language/en/ folder to try to have modders use the mod/ folder instead of dumping it in with the rest.
Also you could add another folder, template/mod/ like you have in the language/en/ folder to try to have modders use the mod/ folder instead of dumping it in with the rest.
- Black Antitoon
- Registered User
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:50 pm
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
I can't wait for the feature tracker to reopen.
What would you think about a one-minute delay in sending e-mail notifications, so that if you are online and you refresh the topic (and see the last post) the e-mail is cancelled and is not sent and you do not get useless notifications? The delay of course should be customisable from the UCP. By the way, how would you say "possible to be disabled" in one word? "Disablable"?
What would you think about a one-minute delay in sending e-mail notifications, so that if you are online and you refresh the topic (and see the last post) the e-mail is cancelled and is not sent and you do not get useless notifications? The delay of course should be customisable from the UCP. By the way, how would you say "possible to be disabled" in one word? "Disablable"?
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
We plan on moving them into a sub directory.EXreaction wrote:Sounds good, but could you maybe move the mcp template files to template/mcp/ and the ucp files to template/ucp/? That would make working with templates much easier I think.
Also you could add another folder, template/mod/ like you have in the language/en/ folder to try to have modders use the mod/ folder instead of dumping it in with the rest.
Freedom from fear
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
I've already brought that up Amtitoon.. Acydburn said that the email gets sent the second the post gets posted. Just because the email doesn't get there that fast doesn't mean there is anyway of stopping it (thats the abridged version of what he said, anyway). But I do agree that there should be a 5 minute period or something there after a post gets posted before the email gets sent to give you time to read it before it sends you a notification.
- EXreaction
- Registered User
- Posts: 1555
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 2:15 am
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
Great.DavidMJ wrote:We plan on moving them into a sub directory.
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
What I would like is a options where admins can force ppl to search the forums first before starting a new topic or perhaps even posting something. The user would enter there message, when they post they get the search result and can choice to post it in one of those topics instead.
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
- Prince of area51
- Registered User
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 8:46 pm
- Location: Manchester, UK
- Contact:
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
Thats pretty much a MOD request. Try posting it in [3.0.x] MOD Requests.Alfatrion wrote:What I would like is a options where admins can force ppl to search the forums first before starting a new topic or perhaps even posting something. The user would enter there message, when they post they get the search result and can choice to post it in one of those topics instead.
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
Its actuallyalready possible if you indtall the auto group MOD.Prince of area51 wrote:Thats pretty much a MOD request. Try posting it in [3.0.x] MOD Requests.Alfatrion wrote:What I would like is a options where admins can force ppl to search the forums first before starting a new topic or perhaps even posting something. The user would enter there message, when they post they get the search result and can choice to post it in one of those topics instead.
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
Tanks for the tip paulus.
The functionality of lots of mods for 2.0 where include in to 3.0. I'm saying this would be nice to be included in to 3.2.Prince of area51 wrote:Thats pretty much a MOD request. Try posting it in [3.0.x] MOD Requests.Alfatrion wrote:What I would like is a options where admins can force ppl to search the forums first before starting a new topic or perhaps even posting something. The user would enter there message, when they post they get the search result and can choice to post it in one of those topics instead.
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
- Highway of Life
- Registered User
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:18 pm
- Location: I'd love to change the World, but they won't give me the Source Code
- Contact:
Re: phpBB 3.2 Discussion
This, to me, seems like a very unique situation that would likely not be used by most people, and in my opinion better suited as a MOD only instead of core functionality.Alfatrion wrote:Tanks for the tip paulus.
The functionality of lots of mods for 2.0 where include in to 3.0. I'm saying this would be nice to be included in to 3.2.Prince of area51 wrote:Thats pretty much a MOD request. Try posting it in [3.0.x] MOD Requests.Alfatrion wrote:What I would like is a options where admins can force ppl to search the forums first before starting a new topic or perhaps even posting something. The user would enter there message, when they post they get the search result and can choice to post it in one of those topics instead.