Is phpbb3 completly rewritten?
Forum rules
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
Discussion of general topics related to the new release and its place in the world. Don't discuss new features, report bugs, ask for support, et cetera. Don't use this to spam for other boards or attack those boards!
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:30 pm
Re: Is phpbb3 completly rewritten?
LOLGumfuzi wrote: and maybe these hunderd lines are empty lines between some functions
Administrator of The Fun Bucket
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:44 pm
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Is phpbb3 completly rewritten?
Being serious for a moment, I can think of about two sections of code that are similar between 2.0 and 3.0, and both have been due to backporting from 3.0.
The first is the sessions code in 2.0.x after 2.0.18 is based around that of 3.0, of which improvements and changes were forwardported from the backport. (:!:)
The second is the highlight code after 2.0.21.
Any others people can think of?
NeoThermic
The first is the sessions code in 2.0.x after 2.0.18 is based around that of 3.0, of which improvements and changes were forwardported from the backport. (:!:)
The second is the highlight code after 2.0.21.
Any others people can think of?
NeoThermic
phpBB release date pool!
The NeoThermic.com... a well of information. Ask me for the bit bucket so you can drink its goodness. ||新熱です
The NeoThermic.com... a well of information. Ask me for the bit bucket so you can drink its goodness. ||新熱です
Re: Is phpbb3 completly rewritten?
The visual confirmation in 2.x is backported from 3.x if I remember - but then substantially re-written again for 3.x anyway...
-
- Registered User
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:44 pm
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Is phpbb3 completly rewritten?
profpete wrote: The visual confirmation in 2.x is backported from 3.x if I remember - but then substantially re-written again for 3.x anyway...
Yes, the zlib emulation code was backported into the visual confirmation.
However, the bulk of the visual confirmation that is in 2.0 has always been in 2.0, if only in the /contrib directory before 2.0.10
NeoThermic
phpBB release date pool!
The NeoThermic.com... a well of information. Ask me for the bit bucket so you can drink its goodness. ||新熱です
The NeoThermic.com... a well of information. Ask me for the bit bucket so you can drink its goodness. ||新熱です