prosilver2
Forum rules
Please do not post support questions regarding installing, updating, or upgrading phpBB 3.3.x. If you need support for phpBB 3.3.x please visit the 3.3.x Support Forum on phpbb.com.
If you have questions regarding writing extensions please post in Extension Writers Discussion to receive proper guidance from our staff and community.
Please do not post support questions regarding installing, updating, or upgrading phpBB 3.3.x. If you need support for phpBB 3.3.x please visit the 3.3.x Support Forum on phpbb.com.
If you have questions regarding writing extensions please post in Extension Writers Discussion to receive proper guidance from our staff and community.
- CarpCharacin
- Registered User
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:49 am
prosilver2
It is looking like there will be a new style in phpbb 3.3/4.0. Will there be a prosilver2 style? I think that there should be one. I think that it should look the same as the prosilver that is included in phpbb 3.2.
Re: prosilver2
officially I think the plan is to probably support it at first but eventually phase it out for the new style as its two difficult to maintain two themes over a long period of time. Much the same reasoning/way subsilver is going.
- CarpCharacin
- Registered User
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:49 am
Re: prosilver2
So there will be an official prosilver2 at first in 3.3/4.0?
Re: prosilver2
of course there has to be a transition period for adoption... This does not mean that prosilver will have all the bells and whistles that a new theme has. Infact unless someone ports prosilvers design over to work off the new theme its going to be only major breaking compatibility changes though once a new theme is released just like subsilver was when prosilver was released.
also sidenote you can stop throwing around 4.0 everywhere ... we get it but 3.3 is more likely or more accurately 3.3.0
also sidenote you can stop throwing around 4.0 everywhere ... we get it but 3.3 is more likely or more accurately 3.3.0
- CarpCharacin
- Registered User
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:49 am
Re: prosilver2
It should be called 4.0.0 IMO. The original plan was to call phpbb 3.0 phpbb 2.2, but it was named 3.0 because of the new theme and the lack of backwards compatibility with 2.0. I think that phpbb 3.3.0 should be named phpbb 4.0.0 instead.
Re: prosilver2
why?CarpCharacin wrote: ↑Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:23 pmI think that phpbb 3.3.0 should be named phpbb 4.0.0 instead.
Re: prosilver2
The current development version is phpBB 3.3 for new features. A transition to 4.0 would only happen if we'd completely get rid of any backward compatibility.
- CarpCharacin
- Registered User
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:49 am
Re: prosilver2
Did you read my post?mrgtb wrote: ↑Mon Sep 19, 2016 2:32 pmwhy?CarpCharacin wrote: ↑Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:23 pmI think that phpbb 3.3.0 should be named phpbb 4.0.0 instead.
- CarpCharacin
- Registered User
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 4:49 am