$no_checkins == BETA ??

poyntesm · Post by **poyntesm** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:43 pm

No checkins for the last few days...first time that has happened in a while.

/Me wonders is a beta release being cooked up??

karlsemple · Post by **karlsemple** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:46 pm

you should know by now they are not going to answer that......there are no release dates for any part of this project and that includes the BETA. It will be released when they feel it is ready to be released as a beta

Eelke · Post by **Eelke** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:59 pm

Hey, he's just speculating

Acyd Burn · Post by **Acyd Burn** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:02 pm

We are currently not able to checkin our changes due to sf's CVS being down since the 30th march.

SF Status Page wrote: ( 2006-04-03 05:55:21 - Project CVS Service ) On 2006-03-30 the developer CVS server had a substantial system failure. Due to the implementation of the CVS service, there is a single point of failure with multiple points of recovery (there is more than one data source we could potentially recover from if there is any data loss as a result of the failure). This outage currently affects developer CVS access directly, but we have disabled tarball updates and data syncs from the developer CVS server to the anonymous pserver/ViewCVS hosts as an additional level of precaution. Our main focus since the outage was detected has been to safegaurd all data on the developer CVS server as well as possible. We are currently attempting to backup the data on the host, which is taking longer than we initially anticipated it would, but is a necessary step to fully safegaurd the host's data. Next, we are going to perform some data validation to ensure the data set appears valid. Pending successful completion of those steps, we'll reenable developer CVS access. A few days after, we'll reenable CVS tarballs and syncs to anonymous CVS. In the mean time, we're currently advancing plans for a CVS architecture change based upon the knowledge we gained during Subversion deployment to eliminate the single point of failure that developer CVS currently has, add horizontal scalability and overall service resiliance. However, we still do not have an estimate on when developer CVS services will be restored, but we have been, and currently are actively working to restore access to CVS. We appreciate your patience with us while we work to properly resolve this major outage.

karlsemple · Post by **karlsemple** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 2:06 pm

still down

wow taking their time about sorting it out

poyntesm · Post by **poyntesm** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:07 pm

Would you guys not migrate to SVN now that subversion is in full production @ Sf?

rename files anyone

Oh and it was just a none too busy day in work that made me start dreaming I would see BETA pop up here. Keep up the great work..I am truely excited about phpBB3.

NNO-Stephen · Post by **NNO-Stephen** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:56 pm

Acyd Burn wrote: We are currently not able to checkin our changes due to sf's CVS being down since the 30th march.

SF Status Page wrote: ( 2006-04-03 05:55:21 - Project CVS Service ) On 2006-03-30 the developer CVS server had a substantial system failure. Due to the implementation of the CVS service, there is a single point of failure with multiple points of recovery (there is more than one data source we could potentially recover from if there is any data loss as a result of the failure). This outage currently affects developer CVS access directly, but we have disabled tarball updates and data syncs from the developer CVS server to the anonymous pserver/ViewCVS hosts as an additional level of precaution. Our main focus since the outage was detected has been to safegaurd all data on the developer CVS server as well as possible. We are currently attempting to backup the data on the host, which is taking longer than we initially anticipated it would, but is a necessary step to fully safegaurd the host's data. Next, we are going to perform some data validation to ensure the data set appears valid. Pending successful completion of those steps, we'll reenable developer CVS access. A few days after, we'll reenable CVS tarballs and syncs to anonymous CVS. In the mean time, we're currently advancing plans for a CVS architecture change based upon the knowledge we gained during Subversion deployment to eliminate the single point of failure that developer CVS currently has, add horizontal scalability and overall service resiliance. However, we still do not have an estimate on when developer CVS services will be restored, but we have been, and currently are actively working to restore access to CVS. We appreciate your patience with us while we work to properly resolve this major outage.

well that definitely explains it. I've been watching the CVS updates like a hawk but nothin... hope they get that *beep* sorted out soon cause I can't wait to see all the pending commits

rivaldo · Post by **rivaldo** » Mon Apr 03, 2006 4:01 pm

I knew something was up. Just one of those occasional disasters that interfere with the continued forward momentum of phpBB's development. Remember when the server's stats package was hacked into back in early 2005?

MKruer · Post by **MKruer** » Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:35 am

[less then constructive criticism]
And to think they were only one commit from the first beta, Oh well guess this means there will be another year of pre-alphas.

[\less then constructive criticism]

Just kidding

karlsemple · Post by **karlsemple** » Tue Apr 04, 2006 5:47 am

MKruer wrote: [less then constructive criticism]
And to think they were only one commit from the first beta, Oh well guess this means there will be another year of pre-alphas.
[\less then constructive criticism]

Just kidding

and it would still be worth the wait

Development Discussion Board

$no_checkins == BETA ??

$no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??

Re: $no_checkins == BETA ??