actually, this is not a case of "not finished", but rather a bug.Stelminator wrote:the code's not broken, it's not finished. therefore there is nothing to fix.Nadrien wrote: But why? It gives the development team something to fix.![]()
the code was "more correct" until revision 1.14, where acydburn made a change and introduce this bug (i refer to the 2nd bug in the report).