*Daniel wrote:Um excuse me, SMF does have a mobile theme, it part of 2.0.1 here another forum:
Main link: http://phpmotion.com/forum/
Mobile: http://phpmotion.com/forum/index.php?wap2



*Daniel wrote:Um excuse me, SMF does have a mobile theme, it part of 2.0.1 here another forum:
Main link: http://phpmotion.com/forum/
Mobile: http://phpmotion.com/forum/index.php?wap2
Oh, I didn't realise that that was what was meant, I thought he meant using them in Prosilver. I've got nothing against using it in a separate style.naderman wrote:Did you consider that one can actually use @media attributes in a separate mobile style and doesn't have to use them as part of the default prosilver?
I'm not against a style from scratch, I just don't think it will happen, and I think that if it does it won't improve on Prosilver on the mobile.naderman wrote:Rather than just raging against anyone who dare suggest anything other than what you want, maybe think about the other options and consider if they aren't doable as well. As they quite definitely are and have been used by others in the past. You might also have noticed that you are the only person going on about requiring Javascript, and maybe should consider if you should go along with what everyone else appears to think would be a better solution, rather than continuing this fight forever.
My bad, I was looking for automatic detection and links with "Mobile" in. It never even occurred to me that people might still use WAP! xD*Daniel wrote:Um excuse me, SMF does have a mobile theme, it part of 2.0.1 here another forum:
Main link: http://phpmotion.com/forum/
Mobile: http://phpmotion.com/forum/index.php?wap2
http://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?wap2imkingdavid wrote:*Daniel wrote:Um excuse me, SMF does have a mobile theme, it part of 2.0.1 here another forum:
Main link: http://phpmotion.com/forum/
Mobile: http://phpmotion.com/forum/index.php?wap2![]()
![]()
That's a core theme? I hope ours doesn't look anything like that.
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
I thought phpBB didn't care what other software did ...Arty wrote:Point me to a modern forum software that doesn't work without JS.
We don't care what they do as far as adding bloat and unnecessary features that only a minor subset of users would even think about thinking about using. However, in this case, it is smart to follow trends. People are tending towards using mobile devices to access web content, so it only makes sense to give them a user-friendly experience via a user friendly style.wGEric wrote:I thought phpBB didn't care what other software did ...Arty wrote:Point me to a modern forum software that doesn't work without JS.
yep it a core theme, and it works when javascript is turned offimkingdavid wrote:*Daniel wrote:Um excuse me, SMF does have a mobile theme, it part of 2.0.1 here another forum:
Main link: http://phpmotion.com/forum/
Mobile: http://phpmotion.com/forum/index.php?wap2![]()
![]()
That's a core theme? I hope ours doesn't look anything like that.
Well automatic detection is working for me, so I guess it work base on user-agent.callumacrae wrote: My bad, I was looking for automatic detection and links with "Mobile" in. It never even occurred to me that people might still use WAP! xD
No unsolicited PMs please except for quotes.psoTFX wrote: I went with Olympus because as I said to the teams ... "It's been one hell of a hill to climb"
In a recent test of mine on a fishing board (so non-technical users), 99.8% of requests from mobile devices supported JavaScript.Unknown Bliss wrote:The majority of mobile devices support JS anyway.