Search found 1566 matches
- Fri Jun 20, 2014 11:57 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Allow Twig Extensions
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10921
Re: [RFC] Allow Twig Extensions
What do you need to add twig extensions for?
- Tue Jun 17, 2014 2:44 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: Drop support for Firebird
- Replies: 12
- Views: 100359
Re: Drop support for Firebird
Yes please.
- Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:58 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: An option to disable responsiveness for large screens?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7705
Re: An option to disable responsiveness for large screens?
We've only had one person request this, so while yes, it is not a 5 minute task that just anyone can do, I don't see any reason we should support this use case.
- Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:55 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Ability For Search To Index/Search Exts & Custom Pages
- Replies: 8
- Views: 16385
Re: RFC: Ability For Search To Index/Search Exts & Custom Pages
This change would require significant API changes. TBH, I'd rather throw out our entire search system and use another library--our search system doesn't really work that great and is a very large and complex chunk of code.
- Tue Jun 03, 2014 2:32 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
- Replies: 113
- Views: 278177
Re: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
If it's placed in all/ -> applies to every single style installed prosilver/ -> applies to prosilver and any style which inherits from it subsilver2/ -> applies to subsilver2 and any style which inherits from it foobar/ -> applies to foobar and any style which inherits from it barfoo/ -> applies to ...
- Mon Jun 02, 2014 10:25 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: An option to disable responsiveness for large screens?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7705
Re: An option to disable responsiveness for large screens?
We wouldn't want to do this as a core feature, it's an end user preference and depends on a particular machine that user is using. This should be fairly easy to change for your own preferences on one particular system with a greasemonkey script or something of that sort.
- Wed May 21, 2014 12:10 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [RFC] HTML markup cleaning
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14780
Re: [RFC] HTML markup cleaning
It would be fine to address that in the same pr if it's related.
- Wed May 21, 2014 2:31 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Staggered Database Restore (like bigdump)
- Replies: 18
- Views: 59418
Re: [RFC] Staggered Database Restore (like bigdump)
Different systems to backup the database would not be useful. Either we have one that is working or not. As far as exporting it into some other format, I would be against it if that is custom phpBB code that we must maintain. If it is done by some library, then great, but the more tools we try to su...
- Wed May 21, 2014 2:18 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Sortable extension events
- Replies: 33
- Views: 118720
Re: Sortable extension events
This is an administrative decision and a developer decision. Developers must decide when there may be issues of dependencies. Administrators must decide when the question is about ordering. The following example should be possible if we choose to support ordering at all: 1. foobar must run after bot...
- Wed May 21, 2014 2:09 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [RFC] HTML markup cleaning
- Replies: 10
- Views: 14780
Re: [RFC] HTML markup cleaning
I would try to fix one type of issue at a time; so that PR you sent may be fine, but I do not know the extent of the changes required. As an example, say we had 100 instances of <div><span></span>message</div>. Removing that span on every single page should be one pull request.