Search found 1890 matches
- Tue May 11, 2010 3:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] MODX 2.0
- Replies: 21
- Views: 44036
Re: [RFC] MODX 2.0
This is one of the chief complaints users of MODX had about MODX 1.0.0 - all the styles and languages were separated from the "actual" MOD instructions. This was confusing and frustrating. Do we want to go through that again? The initial proposal was to just put everything in one file. I ...
- Sun May 09, 2010 2:39 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] PDO / third party DBAL
- Replies: 35
- Views: 70654
Re: [RFC] PDO / third party DBAL
Anybody ever tried installing phpBB on something else than MySQL? It's not fun. What happens is all your real error messages get suppressed (using @) and instead you get messages such as "not an error" (sqlite) or "no error message given" (postgres). Add blank/white page with MS...
- Wed May 05, 2010 1:11 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: Subversion on Git
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9352
Re: Subversion on Git
Very ironic indeed!
- Mon May 03, 2010 1:05 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: phpbb Testing Architecture
- Replies: 16
- Views: 34498
Re: phpbb Testing Architecture
phpbb Quick Install Does not support installing different code versions. Does not actually work for me. Other issues? I haven't touched it for ages, so I'd assume it's not working. Oh I didn't notice this before. QI is being actively worked on by tumba25. Will be provided to the MOD community in th...
- Mon May 03, 2010 12:57 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: phpbb Testing Architecture
- Replies: 16
- Views: 34498
Re: phpbb Testing Architecture
*raises hand*nn- wrote:Who runs development code (trunk) on a board they actually use?
The dev team has a pretty good testing procedure now. I'll let them talk about that.
- Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] MOD Installation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 59460
Re: MOD Installation
You realize of course that patches are universally useful while modx is phpbb (version) specific, right? We're talking about phpBB here so I don't see how patches being universal has any relevance. MODX has been around for over 2 years now so it could be argued that for phpBB, MODX is universal now...
- Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: MOD Installation
- Replies: 24
- Views: 34748
Re: MOD Installation
You realize of course that patches are universally useful while modx is phpbb (version) specific, right? We're talking about phpBB here so I don't see how patches being universal has any relevance. MODX has been around for over 2 years now so it could be argued that for phpBB, MODX is universal now...
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] MOD Installation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 59460
Re: MOD Installation
That wouldn't be something for AutoMOD to handle though. Would be more for a future version of MODX (here I go mentioning 2.0 again...).nn- wrote:I would like a facility to convert modx files to patch files and sql files.
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: MOD Installation
- Replies: 24
- Views: 34748
Re: MOD Installation
That wouldn't be something for AutoMOD to handle though. Would be more for a future version of MODX (here I go mentioning 2.0 again...).nn- wrote:I would like a facility to convert modx files to patch files and sql files.
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: MOD Installation
- Replies: 24
- Views: 34748
Re: MOD Installation
A suggestion I have is to be able to remove the need for a separate SQL install file. Possibly adding new tags to the MODX format to allow permission addition/set, SQL table addition/alteration, row insertion/removal, etc. and module addition/removal. That sounds like a good idea. Maybe somehow int...