Search found 1890 matches

by DavidIQ
Tue May 11, 2010 3:16 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] MODX 2.0
Replies: 21
Views: 44036

Re: [RFC] MODX 2.0

This is one of the chief complaints users of MODX had about MODX 1.0.0 - all the styles and languages were separated from the "actual" MOD instructions. This was confusing and frustrating. Do we want to go through that again? The initial proposal was to just put everything in one file. I ...
by DavidIQ
Sun May 09, 2010 2:39 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] PDO / third party DBAL
Replies: 35
Views: 70654

Re: [RFC] PDO / third party DBAL

Anybody ever tried installing phpBB on something else than MySQL? It's not fun. What happens is all your real error messages get suppressed (using @) and instead you get messages such as "not an error" (sqlite) or "no error message given" (postgres). Add blank/white page with MS...
by DavidIQ
Wed May 05, 2010 1:11 pm
Forum: Chit Chat
Topic: Subversion on Git
Replies: 2
Views: 9352

Re: Subversion on Git

:lol:
Very ironic indeed!
by DavidIQ
Mon May 03, 2010 1:05 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: phpbb Testing Architecture
Replies: 16
Views: 34498

Re: phpbb Testing Architecture

phpbb Quick Install Does not support installing different code versions. Does not actually work for me. Other issues? I haven't touched it for ages, so I'd assume it's not working. Oh I didn't notice this before. QI is being actively worked on by tumba25. Will be provided to the MOD community in th...
by DavidIQ
Mon May 03, 2010 12:57 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: phpbb Testing Architecture
Replies: 16
Views: 34498

Re: phpbb Testing Architecture

nn- wrote:Who runs development code (trunk) on a board they actually use?
*raises hand*

The dev team has a pretty good testing procedure now. I'll let them talk about that.
by DavidIQ
Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:35 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] MOD Installation
Replies: 30
Views: 59460

Re: MOD Installation

You realize of course that patches are universally useful while modx is phpbb (version) specific, right? We're talking about phpBB here so I don't see how patches being universal has any relevance. MODX has been around for over 2 years now so it could be argued that for phpBB, MODX is universal now...
by DavidIQ
Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:35 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: MOD Installation
Replies: 24
Views: 34748

Re: MOD Installation

You realize of course that patches are universally useful while modx is phpbb (version) specific, right? We're talking about phpBB here so I don't see how patches being universal has any relevance. MODX has been around for over 2 years now so it could be argued that for phpBB, MODX is universal now...
by DavidIQ
Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:21 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] MOD Installation
Replies: 30
Views: 59460

Re: MOD Installation

nn- wrote:I would like a facility to convert modx files to patch files and sql files.
That wouldn't be something for AutoMOD to handle though. Would be more for a future version of MODX (here I go mentioning 2.0 again...).
by DavidIQ
Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:21 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: MOD Installation
Replies: 24
Views: 34748

Re: MOD Installation

nn- wrote:I would like a facility to convert modx files to patch files and sql files.
That wouldn't be something for AutoMOD to handle though. Would be more for a future version of MODX (here I go mentioning 2.0 again...).
by DavidIQ
Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:16 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: MOD Installation
Replies: 24
Views: 34748

Re: MOD Installation

A suggestion I have is to be able to remove the need for a separate SQL install file. Possibly adding new tags to the MODX format to allow permission addition/set, SQL table addition/alteration, row insertion/removal, etc. and module addition/removal. That sounds like a good idea. Maybe somehow int...