Search found 1889 matches
- Sun May 09, 2010 2:39 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] PDO / third party DBAL
- Replies: 35
- Views: 70572
Re: [RFC] PDO / third party DBAL
Anybody ever tried installing phpBB on something else than MySQL? It's not fun. What happens is all your real error messages get suppressed (using @) and instead you get messages such as "not an error" (sqlite) or "no error message given" (postgres). Add blank/white page with MS...
- Wed May 05, 2010 1:11 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: Subversion on Git
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9345
Re: Subversion on Git
Very ironic indeed!
- Mon May 03, 2010 1:05 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: phpbb Testing Architecture
- Replies: 16
- Views: 34455
Re: phpbb Testing Architecture
phpbb Quick Install Does not support installing different code versions. Does not actually work for me. Other issues? I haven't touched it for ages, so I'd assume it's not working. Oh I didn't notice this before. QI is being actively worked on by tumba25. Will be provided to the MOD community in th...
- Mon May 03, 2010 12:57 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: phpbb Testing Architecture
- Replies: 16
- Views: 34455
Re: phpbb Testing Architecture
*raises hand*nn- wrote:Who runs development code (trunk) on a board they actually use?
The dev team has a pretty good testing procedure now. I'll let them talk about that.
- Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] MOD Installation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 59379
Re: MOD Installation
You realize of course that patches are universally useful while modx is phpbb (version) specific, right? We're talking about phpBB here so I don't see how patches being universal has any relevance. MODX has been around for over 2 years now so it could be argued that for phpBB, MODX is universal now...
- Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: MOD Installation
- Replies: 24
- Views: 34690
Re: MOD Installation
You realize of course that patches are universally useful while modx is phpbb (version) specific, right? We're talking about phpBB here so I don't see how patches being universal has any relevance. MODX has been around for over 2 years now so it could be argued that for phpBB, MODX is universal now...
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] MOD Installation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 59379
Re: MOD Installation
That wouldn't be something for AutoMOD to handle though. Would be more for a future version of MODX (here I go mentioning 2.0 again...).nn- wrote:I would like a facility to convert modx files to patch files and sql files.
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: MOD Installation
- Replies: 24
- Views: 34690
Re: MOD Installation
That wouldn't be something for AutoMOD to handle though. Would be more for a future version of MODX (here I go mentioning 2.0 again...).nn- wrote:I would like a facility to convert modx files to patch files and sql files.
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] MOD Installation
- Replies: 30
- Views: 59379
Re: MOD Installation
A suggestion I have is to be able to remove the need for a separate SQL install file. Possibly adding new tags to the MODX format to allow permission addition/set, SQL table addition/alteration, row insertion/removal, etc. and module addition/removal. That sounds like a good idea. Maybe somehow int...
- Wed Apr 28, 2010 8:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: MOD Installation
- Replies: 24
- Views: 34690
Re: MOD Installation
A suggestion I have is to be able to remove the need for a separate SQL install file. Possibly adding new tags to the MODX format to allow permission addition/set, SQL table addition/alteration, row insertion/removal, etc. and module addition/removal. That sounds like a good idea. Maybe somehow int...