Search found 548 matches
- Fri Jan 10, 2014 2:45 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Permission Setting to show IP address to Admins only
- Replies: 21
- Views: 40493
Re: Permission Setting to show IP address to Admins only
I support having this permission in phpBB core as there very likely are cases where limiting access to IP addresses is (legally) beneficial; "principle of data economy" and "need to know" and all that.
- Mon Nov 25, 2013 10:38 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Why some relational tables don't have composite primary keys?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9483
Re: Why some relational tables don't have composite primary keys?
Considering that it has been like that since forever, I would say that 3.1 is fine.Danielx64 wrote:Would this igo into 3.0 or 3.1?
- Sun Nov 24, 2013 12:41 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Why some relational tables don't have composite primary keys?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 9483
Re: Why some relational tables don't have composite primary keys?
To me this just sounds like a bug that should be fixed. Feel free to have a look at the other tables as well.
- Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:48 am
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: State of Area51
- Replies: 147
- Views: 228626
Re: State of Area51
Updated to 8ae315a796cc81b6ca4f423eb9bae20925f51fdb (phpBB 3.1.0-a2).
- Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:42 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: Rename "purge" to "uninstall", differentiate between "install" and "enable"
- Replies: 23
- Views: 43199
Re: Rename "purge" to "uninstall", differentiate between "install" and "enable"
I completely agree.naderman wrote:There is no installation at all. After you upload files you can enable and disable the extension. We will not introduce the concept of an installation process simply because some people are used to it from Windows applications.
- Wed Nov 06, 2013 1:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] VIP Paid Membership
- Replies: 34
- Views: 94166
Re: [RFC] VIP Paid Membership
I agree with the previous poster. This should not be part of phpBB core.
- Sat Nov 02, 2013 11:04 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Use utf8mb4 and require MySQL 5.5.3 / MariaDB 5.5
- Replies: 8
- Views: 23384
Re: Use utf8mb4 and require MySQL 5.5.3 / MariaDB 5.5
For future reference: An INDEX on an utf8 varchar(255) column has size 3*255 = 765 bytes. An INDEX on an utf8mb4 varchar(255) column will likely have size 4*255 = 1020 bytes. The maximum key size for a column is 767 bytes by default. As a result, varchar(255) columns may have to be reduced to varcha...
- Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:44 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Use utf8mb4 and require MySQL 5.5.3 / MariaDB 5.5
- Replies: 8
- Views: 23384
Re: Use utf8mb4 and require MySQL 5.5.3 / MariaDB 5.5
MySQL 5.0 is no longer maintained and MySQL 5.1 will probably be no longer maintained when phpBB 3.2 gets released, so this should be fine to do for phpBB 3.2 or 3.3.
- Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:41 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Support for MariaDB
- Replies: 29
- Views: 95491
Re: [RFC] Support for MariaDB
I think this RFC can be rejected. At least for now, because there is nothing to do.
- Sat Oct 19, 2013 7:37 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Use utf8mb4 and require MySQL 5.5.3 / MariaDB 5.5
- Replies: 8
- Views: 23384
Use utf8mb4 and require MySQL 5.5.3 / MariaDB 5.5
Background MySQL's "default" UTF8 character set only supports 3 byte characters which prevents the use of some characters such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji. A 4 byte utf8 character set utf8mb4 has been introduced with MySQL 5.5. Proposal I propose upgrading all utf8 column charac...