Search found 830 matches

by hanakin
Wed May 11, 2011 6:32 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Blizzard's New Forum
Replies: 10
Views: 12068

Re: Blizzard's New Forum

I agree with nn-, too much information in such a small space, it's (one of) the reason(s) that phpbb does so much better than SMF, among other things, SMF just crams to many bars and whatnot in one space, and makes it look a little stupid meanwhile, why do this as a default? you can already do this...
by hanakin
Wed May 11, 2011 12:33 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: A small CSS optimisation
Replies: 6
Views: 4442

Re: A small CSS optimisation

the necessity for the button itself is not necessary and the complete removal of the styleswitcher has been proposed in the tracker and is already in the works via the jquery conversion.
by hanakin
Wed May 11, 2011 12:25 pm
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Merged] Include and use jQuery (originally for 3.2)
Replies: 74
Views: 50914

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Include and use jQuery

This reminded me that we should put javascript at the bottom of pages. Hopefully both jquery itself and all of our code. http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#js_bottom totally agree and planned on it for the overhaul, however its not that easy until we convert to jquery and completely ...
by hanakin
Tue May 10, 2011 4:50 am
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Merged] Include and use jQuery (originally for 3.2)
Replies: 74
Views: 50914

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Include and use jQuery

RMcGirr83 wrote:Why would one ever need to "fall back". I have never run across a situation where the present jQuery failed to provide what a previous version had provided.
not a version fallback a cdn fallback to loacal version/alternate cdn
by hanakin
Tue May 10, 2011 2:18 am
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Merged] Include and use jQuery (originally for 3.2)
Replies: 74
Views: 50914

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Include and use jQuery

If board owners want to change it to point to a CDN they can; I fail to see why it needs an administration interface, the ACP is already far too complicated. The people that realise the implications of using a CDN are probably clued up enough to make a very simple template change. I agree, while i ...
by hanakin
Sat May 07, 2011 3:45 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: - Ideas for phpBB 3.2 -
Replies: 25
Views: 19738

Re: - Ideas for phpBB 3.2 -

@amigojack I agree with some of which you have pointed out and this is actually in the works for the theme update im working on here: http://area51.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=35613 <u> currently is not used its a span with underline applied through styles strike is not a default bbcode as...
by hanakin
Tue May 03, 2011 8:29 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: Prosilver Overhaul/Modernization
Replies: 55
Views: 41457

Re: Prosilver Overhaul/Modernization

Some things in this topic sound interesting while others are not that kind of thing i want to see :/ / what exactly is it you disagree with? also keep inmind that this topic has evolved since its creation and is still massively in flux. Is there anything specific you wish to see changed or fixed. I...
by hanakin
Sun May 01, 2011 6:45 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Create a new user account through the ACP
Replies: 40
Views: 50845

Re: [RFC] Create a new user account through the ACP

I agree this is very useful, as a development tool but not sure what the advantage would be for the average user please elaborate with scenarios might help your case ;)
by hanakin
Sat Apr 30, 2011 2:30 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] CSS Image Sprites
Replies: 50
Views: 32563

Re: [RFC] CSS Image Sprites

Tqken into mind im kind of drunk at the moment but im Sorry that to me is a theme flaw and ignorance on the part of the user the CSS for my version will be alot easier to manipulate the simple stuff and I'm sorry but I can teach a monkey how to use firebug to make changes to a theme.
by hanakin
Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:00 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] CSS Image Sprites
Replies: 50
Views: 32563

Re: [RFC] CSS Image Sprites

@David I understand this, however this is what I personally don't like from a developer stand point I'm not saying it does not have it's upsides.