Search found 89 matches

by sajaki
Mon Dec 06, 2010 10:37 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Älphäbet url support
Replies: 18
Views: 19047

Re: Älphäbet url support

hi, Is this feature still deferred to 4.0 or will it already be included in 3.2 or maybe even in 3.1 (3.1 i think not, haven't seen an rfc for it) ? Given that , mor...
by sajaki
Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:45 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: sql_build_query change proposal
Replies: 3
Views: 4945

Re: sql_build_query change proposal

ToonArmy wrote:As a crude hack you could probably do

Code: Select all

'FROM' => array(
TOPICS_TABLE . ' ' => 't2',
if you debug that, the resulting sql will only have the second table in it, i.e. t2, and any selected value referring to t1 will cause an sql error.
by sajaki
Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:36 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: sql_build_query change proposal
Replies: 3
Views: 4945

sql_build_query change proposal

Concerning , i'd like to propose a change. the 'FROM' key array should be structured inversely of what it is now. so instead of : 'FROM' => array( BOOKMARKS_TABLE => 'b', TOPICS_TABLE => 't' ), you write this : 'FROM' => array( 'b' => BOOKMARKS_...
by sajaki
Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:15 am
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Accepted] Coding Guideline Modifications
Replies: 79
Views: 91408

Re: [RFC|Accepted] Coding Guideline Modifications

The file header still needs to be adjusted. Currently it is: /** * * @package {PACKAGENAME} * @version $Id: $ * @copyright (c) 2007 phpBB Group * @license GNU Public License * */ I'd suggest something among the lines of: /** * * @package {PACKAGENAME} ...
by sajaki
Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:12 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected Event Requests
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] hook_template_snippet
Replies: 8
Views: 25191

Re: [RFC] hook_template_snippet : Injecting code into the te

hmm. this sounds useful. Since 90 % of mods touch overall_header, i think this may possibly eliminate mod conflicts in templates.
by sajaki
Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:20 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] MODX 2.0
Replies: 21
Views: 26863

Re: [RFC] MODX 2.0

With 3.0 I'm having a hard time recalling a single mod that depends on another mod. Do such even exist? This is a perfect example where mod authors should be asked whether they would like to be able to depend on other mods. Yes they exist. all the plugins of my main mod are implemented as MODX, and...
by sajaki
Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:30 pm
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Merged] No db storage of stylesheets and templates
Replies: 23
Views: 39044

Re: [RFC|Accepted] No db storage of themes and stylesheets

This would have the advantage that debugging a css file in firebug will actually lead to an existing file instead of style.php where you don't really know where the originating css came from. So does this mean that the current model of prosilver will no longer be followed, i.e. compiling stylesheets...
by sajaki
Fri Jun 25, 2010 10:17 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: It's not a MOD, it's a feature package
Replies: 6
Views: 6875

Re: It's not a MOD, it's a feature package

Hi everyone, as I'm not so much into the current development of 3.1, I'll just barge in with my idea. As a MOD author I often struggle with the features my MODs offer. One the hand, I would like to follow the kiss rule (keep it sweet and simple) and don't include too many options. On the other hand...
by sajaki
Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:50 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: WYSIWYG editor
Replies: 104
Views: 109538

Re: WYSIWYG editor

maybe it will work for simple formatting, but wysiwyg won't work for complex bbcodes. for example look at this bbcode mod : it calls a server, pulls an xml, instantiates a php class, fetches an rss, formats the output using jquery tools overlay...