Development Discussion Board

hi,

Is this feature still deferred to 4.0 or will it already be included in 3.2 or maybe even in 3.1 (3.1 i think not, haven't seen an rfc for it) ?

http://tracker.phpbb.com/browse/PHPBB3-9779
http://tracker.phpbb.com/browse/PHPBB3-3981

Given that http://www.icann.org/en/topics/idn/fast ...

ToonArmy wrote:As a crude hack you could probably do

Code: Select all

'FROM' => array(
TOPICS_TABLE => 't1',
TOPICS_TABLE . ' ' => 't2',
)
 

if you debug that, the resulting sql will only have the second table in it, i.e. t2, and any selected value referring to t1 will cause an sql error.

Concerning http://wiki.phpbb.com/display/DEV/Dbal.sql+build+query , i'd like to propose a change.

the 'FROM' key array should be structured inversely of what it is now.
so instead of :
'FROM' => array(
BOOKMARKS_TABLE => 'b',
TOPICS_TABLE => 't'
),

you write this :
'FROM' => array ...

The file header still needs to be adjusted. Currently it is:
/**
*
* @package {PACKAGENAME}
* @version $Id: $
* @copyright (c) 2007 phpBB Group
* @license http://opensource.org/licenses/gpl-license.php GNU Public License
*
*/
I'd suggest something among the lines of:
/**
*
* @package ...

hmm. this sounds useful. Since 90 % of mods touch overall_header, i think this may possibly eliminate mod conflicts in templates.

With 3.0 I'm having a hard time recalling a single mod that depends on another mod. Do such even exist? This is a perfect example where mod authors should be asked whether they would like to be able to depend on other mods.

Yes they exist. all the plugins of my main mod are implemented as MODX ...

This would have the advantage that debugging a css file in firebug will actually lead to an existing file instead of style.php where you don't really know where the originating css came from. So does this mean that the current model of prosilver will no longer be followed, i.e. compiling stylesheets ...

Hi everyone,
as I'm not so much into the current development of 3.1, I'll just barge in with my idea.

As a MOD author I often struggle with the features my MODs offer. One the hand, I would like to follow the kiss rule (keep it sweet and simple) and don't include too many options. On the other ...

maybe it will work for simple formatting, but wysiwyg won't work for complex bbcodes.
for example look at this bbcode mod :
http://www.avathar.be/demo/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4&p=8#p8
it calls a server, pulls an xml, instantiates a php class, fetches an rss, formats the output using jquery tools ...