Search found 1155 matches
- Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:32 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: "Migration effectively installed"
- Replies: 13
- Views: 30876
Re: "Migration effectively installed"
A the other way of achieving the same effect, which works on all databases and is generally much simpler to implement, is to record a migration without running it.
- Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:24 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Patch submitting doubts
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11606
Re: Patch submitting doubts
Try session.php?
- Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:19 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Registering new users with no email
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4916
Re: Registering new users with no email
Functioning email is not required for registration. Please ask for help on phpbb.com support forums.
- Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:11 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Patch submitting doubts
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11606
Re: Patch submitting doubts
Github does not allow changing the branch of a pull request. Assuming you created a branch with correct name locally you need to submit a new pull request for it.
For the second part of your post I am not sure what you are asking.
For the second part of your post I am not sure what you are asking.
- Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:03 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Frequently Asked Questions
- Replies: 14
- Views: 101155
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is there going to be a 3.0.12, 3.0.13, etc. release before 3.1.0?
Maybe. 3.0 and 3.1 branches are released on independent schedules.
2. Is 3.0.11 going to be the last 3.0 release before 3.1?
No. 3.0 branch will continue to be supported after 3.1 is released.
3. Can 3.1 be released before ...
Maybe. 3.0 and 3.1 branches are released on independent schedules.
2. Is 3.0.11 going to be the last 3.0 release before 3.1?
No. 3.0 branch will continue to be supported after 3.1 is released.
3. Can 3.1 be released before ...
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:24 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: Dropping the tests/functional directory
- Replies: 11
- Views: 48675
Re: Dropping the tests/functional directory
would be my concern.Oleg wrote:I am not seeing how functional tests (which cover multiple units) would fit into unit test directory structure.
What is an example situation where it is unclear where a test for something is?
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:13 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Include barebone template with every release
- Replies: 18
- Views: 25264
Re: [RFC] Include barebone template with every release
I like the idea of a barebones template as a foundation for style authors to build something other than prosilver with different colors/whitespace.
With that, I have no idea what a "barebones template" is supposed to look like. Any examples from other projects?
With that, I have no idea what a "barebones template" is supposed to look like. Any examples from other projects?
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:12 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Will there be a 3.0.12?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8012
Re: Will there be a 3.0.12?
I am just going to lock this.
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:10 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: "Migration effectively installed"
- Replies: 13
- Views: 30876
Re: "Migration effectively installed"
Documentation is good to have but does not answer the question posed in the first post.
- Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:08 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: Dropping the tests/functional directory
- Replies: 11
- Views: 48675
Re: Dropping the tests/functional directory
I am not seeing how functional tests (which cover multiple units) would fit into unit test directory structure.
I cannot recall a single project that mixed unit and functional tests like that.
I wrote test suites that folded unit tests into integration tests, but this is opposite direction of what ...
I cannot recall a single project that mixed unit and functional tests like that.
I wrote test suites that folded unit tests into integration tests, but this is opposite direction of what ...