Search found 91 matches
- Sat Feb 28, 2015 5:40 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Automated Updating
- Replies: 31
- Views: 92728
Re: Auto-Update
Yeah and they haven't learned anything from it, as was recently proven again. As interesting as the idea might be, I do not see phpBB to have the manpower to fix a screw-up via auto-update in a reasonable time, regardless of the current high skill-level Dev-Team. I am not convinced that this is a ...
- Mon Feb 23, 2015 1:49 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Automated Updating
- Replies: 31
- Views: 92728
Re: Auto-Update
-1
Just look at Microsoft.
Just look at Microsoft.
- Thu Jan 29, 2015 4:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Phpbb and php7
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5205
Phpbb and php7
Ok, this is maybe a bit early but I was reading on a couple of sites that php7 will break backwards compability ( for example -> http://thephp.cc/news/2015/01/php-breaks-backwards-compatibility ). As far as I was understanding the current schedule is an RC in mid 2015 and the release around October ...
- Sun Nov 30, 2014 10:21 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Usage of tables in 3.1
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20032
Re: Usage of tables in 3.1
My guess would be because the memberlist is tabular data. As the original purpose of tables was to present tabular data, they are probably still used for this reason for the memberlist. Before you ask or say it, I do not think that the forum list is tabular data.
- Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:24 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Cookie notice
- Replies: 33
- Views: 73219
Re: [RFC] Cookie notice
Actually, to my understanding this is not quiet correct. It is not only about private data but setting cookies in general.John P wrote:As long as you don't collect private data about a person you don't have to warn about the cookie in EU.
Inlogdata isn't private data.
- Sun Oct 26, 2014 3:02 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Remove "Delete all board cookies"
- Replies: 33
- Views: 60320
Re: Remove "Delete all board cookies"
......
In Germany - if I am not mistaken - they require an imprint page.
......
Correct, even thought it is not necessarily needed for a "personal" or "family" website (§ 5 TMG and § 55 RStV). The interesting part is, that the required "German" imprint page is actually also a EU-Regulation ...
In Germany - if I am not mistaken - they require an imprint page.
......
Correct, even thought it is not necessarily needed for a "personal" or "family" website (§ 5 TMG and § 55 RStV). The interesting part is, that the required "German" imprint page is actually also a EU-Regulation ...
- Sun Oct 12, 2014 4:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: "guest user" What is meant?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15174
Re: "guest user" What is meant?
Hmm, personaly I would also prefer "guest" instead of "guest user". Granted the guests are useing somewhat the forum, but in my opionion a user is registered and participating somehow and not just there. Not sure how to explain it.
- Tue Jul 29, 2014 4:41 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Combine Related functionality (UI Cleanup)
- Replies: 307
- Views: 481753
Re: Combine Related functionality (UI Cleanup)
Sorry, confused icons here.
- Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:46 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Combine Related functionality (UI Cleanup)
- Replies: 307
- Views: 481753
Re: Combine Related functionality (UI Cleanup)
subforums won't work as the icon is already being used as a link to the first unread topic
We could get rid of the current behaviour? Does anyone ever click on those icons? :|
I used them on mobile and probably others use them too.
This! I would hate to have to fiddle around to hit the tiny ...
We could get rid of the current behaviour? Does anyone ever click on those icons? :|
I used them on mobile and probably others use them too.
This! I would hate to have to fiddle around to hit the tiny ...
- Thu Jul 10, 2014 7:56 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Sommething wrong/blocking in overall_header.html
- Replies: 11
- Views: 20024
Re: Sommething wrong/blocking in overall_header.html
If my memory serves me right someone mentioned in another topic, that the description meta tag was supposed to be filled out by the forum owner himself and therefor is empty. If it was also somewhere mentioned that there was no acp-option for it to prevent an acp overkill. But don't quote me on this.