Search found 57 matches
- Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
- Replies: 461
- Views: 1088523
Re: WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
Just checked wordpress and their editor has working buttons in source view. Also it looks really nice.
- Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:10 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
- Replies: 461
- Views: 1088523
Re: [RFC] WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
That's fine and dandy...except you forget that CKEditor was not created with forums in mind. The current behavior is perfectly acceptable in most scenarios and is the behavior of most other WYSIWIG editors. The fact that we currently have buttons that work without a WYSYWIG editor means we are ...
- Mon Dec 24, 2012 9:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Control-Enter for form submission
- Replies: 51
- Views: 43826
Re: Control-Enter for form submission
I agree completely with Oleg about the idea and the non-constructive derailment of the idea. Seems people could really work on sticking to the points that are useful.
I don't think I would use it at first but I might learn to use it if it was implemented. Tab+tab+enter is fine but obviously slower ...
I don't think I would use it at first but I might learn to use it if it was implemented. Tab+tab+enter is fine but obviously slower ...
- Mon Dec 24, 2012 8:49 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Area51 RFC Prefix
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5226
Re: Area51 RFC Prefix
This topic should be prefixed with [RFC]
- Tue Dec 11, 2012 5:14 am
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
- Replies: 461
- Views: 1088523
Re: [RFC] WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
That's actually a "feature" so unless you're going to file a ticket with them as a usability improvement or actually tell them something about it then it's not going to change. Personally I don't see how the buttons mean much of anything at all in source view.
I strongly disagree with this. If ...
I strongly disagree with this. If ...
- Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:17 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Add Error page
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4776
Re: Add Error page
Indeed, the whole "bad for google" argument is also nonsense. If the topic has been deleted, the correct response from an SEO perspective is to send the appropriate status code, like 404, 403 or 410.
- Mon Nov 26, 2012 5:03 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-10418 - WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
- Replies: 461
- Views: 1088523
Re: [RFC] WYSIWYG Editor/Rich Text Editor
After testing TinyMCE , CKEditor and SCEditor the team (me and EXreaction) have decided to keep SCEditor .
I'm posting to lend my support of your decision. I've struggled through using tinyMCE and CKEditor in the past, and have found them to be... unsatisfactory for my needs. They do get the job ...
- Mon Nov 26, 2012 4:10 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Include username in the Overview page.
- Replies: 17
- Views: 10439
Re: Include username in the Overview page.
+1 for adding it to page titles. Page titles are often overlooked and yet quite useful.
+0 for the select dropdown. I don't see that as particularly useful, but meh. If you do, name first as imkingdavid says.
+0 for the select dropdown. I don't see that as particularly useful, but meh. If you do, name first as imkingdavid says.
- Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:09 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] New Custom Profile Field Types
- Replies: 23
- Views: 47686
Re: [RFC] New Custom Profile Field Types
Sweet. +1. Thank you for addressing this 
- Wed Nov 21, 2012 8:59 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Modern profile fields in 3.1
- Replies: 83
- Views: 259104
Re: [RFC] Modern profile fields in 3.1
+1 for turning these special fields into custom profile fields.
From the moment I first started using phpBB years ago I thought it was strange that it had built in (hard coded) support for certain protocols that I couldn't get rid of. I still remember going into the old ACP and wondering where the ...
From the moment I first started using phpBB years ago I thought it was strange that it had built in (hard coded) support for certain protocols that I couldn't get rid of. I still remember going into the old ACP and wondering where the ...