Will this also apply for the database, or just the scripts?
I like underscores because to me it's a lot easier to read. I'm not sure if it's the same for other people, but that's the way I've always written PHP.
Search found 46 matches
- Tue Jan 19, 2010 9:35 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC & Patch][Implemented] Coding Guidelines
- Replies: 55
- Views: 98526
- Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:21 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC & Patch][Implemented] Coding Guidelines
- Replies: 55
- Views: 98526
Re: [RFC & Patch] Coding Guidelines
I don't like the CamelCase (instead of camel_case). The variable without camel-case looks a lot cleaner to me.
Code: Select all
$my_var
$myVar
- Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:10 am
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Easy Mod?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7283
- Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:48 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Search Architecture
- Replies: 28
- Views: 51183
Re: Search Architecture
I said to include tags can be alternative. Whether users use it or not, that's not our concern. The concern is to build a better search. I do not have any comment on the current search architecture, since it is a very complicated thing. But as I have suggested, there could be million ways to implem...
- Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:05 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [Usability] Reducement of confirmation pages / Allow undo
- Replies: 37
- Views: 73889
Re: [Usability] Reducement of confirmation pages / Allow undo
On the topic of deletion, how about implementing a soft delete type feature. In other words, posts don't get deleted from the database but they are removed from view except of mods and admins? Or maybe a Trash Bin forum where deleted posts are automatically moved. Also, I'm not sure if this qualifi...
- Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:03 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Wysiwyg TinyMCE implementation
- Replies: 41
- Views: 69557
Re: Wysiwyg TinyMCE implementation
As already explained, TinyMCE is a HTML WYSIWYG editor, not BBCode. If phpBB reintroducted HTML into the system, like in phpBB2, there would be bloat. If phpBB wished to have a WYSIWYG editor in phpBB, they would have to build one themselves (unless there are BBCode WYSIWYG editors out there, which ...
- Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:24 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.
- Replies: 38
- Views: 99623
Re: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.
How about GMail, the way it gives you the option to undo an action (like if you change a setting)?
I really hate the login success screen though - it's not like you could accidently log in. That's definitely a feature I could do without.
I really hate the login success screen though - it's not like you could accidently log in. That's definitely a feature I could do without.
- Wed Dec 16, 2009 4:51 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [End user][User] Profile control
- Replies: 12
- Views: 22519
Re: [End user][User] Profile control
If plugins are possibly going to be easier to install, I say keep it as a plugin. And what ToonArmy said. ^ToonArmy wrote:phpBB is neither a calendar, nor a gallery nor a kitchen sink; it is simply a bulletin board.
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:34 am
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: IP region restriction
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10622
Re: IP region restriction
Have you read this?
http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopi ... &t=1437125
http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopi ... &t=1437125
- Tue Aug 18, 2009 6:12 am
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: iframe bbcode not possible?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 25767
Re: iframe bbcode not possible?
Hey man, why do not consider the possibility to let that blamed "iframe bbcode" to be used only for certain group of members. I think that a forum must have a core of trusted members. So, all we have to do is to let ONLY those members to use that iframe bbcode. A kind of MOD like the one ...