Development Discussion Board

chocolate

Oh, and another point - rather then having "Sitename • Information", can't we have more descriptive titles?

Just out of interest, why do you think forums would need to see when users have logged in and out? Maybe this would be better left as a MOD/plugin/whatever system phpBB4 will use?

As far as I know, style authors will still be able to use subsilver2 in phpBB 3.1, but there just won't be an *official* subsilver2 style by the phpBB team.

I'm all for removing subsilver2. Style authors can always bring it back, is there really any need for it to be an official (as in "made by phpBB" official) any more?

PS. I only just noticed the new forums on Area51 today.

automation

"Modding" is probably the best way to familiarise yourself with the code. There are a number of sites that help out with 'Modding. I also recommend getting used to the phpBB 'Modding forums , where you can ask questions and post "modifications", and the phpBB Wiki which I have al...

I've looked all over the internet and I've asked at the Google Webmaster Forum, and apparently using 404 errors on dymanic URLs is fine. I might try testing on a site to see what happens, but from what I can see there isn't really a problem.

bantu wrote:Not so sure if this is an issue anymore, but please keep in mind: http://www.phpbb.com/bugs/phpbb3/34945#post158995

I will do some more research on that, however I don't believe this applies to 500 Internal Server Error and 503 Service Unavailable, since these often apply to the entire board.

I remember someone else mentioning this some time ago, but I would like to mention it here, since it seems appropiate mentioning it here. At the moment, phpBB will always send HTTP/1.1 200 OK, even if a 404, 503, 401 or 500 would be more appropiate. These errors are important for bots as well as use...