Search found 494 matches

by igorw
Sat Feb 18, 2012 5:19 pm
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
Replies: 113
Views: 91182

Re: [RFC|Merged] Extensions

We have this one: https://github.com/naderman/phpbb3-example-ext also check the pull request which adds a lot of stuff.
by igorw
Sat Feb 18, 2012 12:36 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Allow all admins to purge cache
Replies: 4
Views: 3149

Re: Allow all admins to purge cache

Agree, restricting to founders makes no sense.
by igorw
Thu Feb 16, 2012 7:55 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Extensions Meta-Data File
Replies: 33
Views: 18108

Re: [RFC] Extensions package description format

People still write official RFCs in text format and it works just fine. It doesn't need to be shiny, it needs to be understandable, readable and editable.
by igorw
Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:53 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Template Vars in JS Files
Replies: 6
Views: 4336

Re: [RFC] Template Vars in JS Files

This is intentional, adding templates into JS cause a lot of problems. If we want to do that, we need to compile the JavaScript. Since these variables are not constants, we'd have to compile it on the fly, so basically generate the JS every time. Which is terrible, JS must be static and cacheable. A...
by igorw
Tue Feb 14, 2012 8:17 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] ACP Search
Replies: 29
Views: 12657

Re: [RFC] ACP Search

I recall talking to DavidMJ about this feature at Londonvasion in 2008. Would definitely be very awesome, but I don't see (yet) how it can be done in a reasonable amount of time.
by igorw
Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:23 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Make the use of defer mandatory
Replies: 62
Views: 23897

Re: [RFC] Make the use of defer mandatory

Well, perhaps those pages just contain outdated information. According to caniuse.com they are supported: http://caniuse.com/script-defer
by igorw
Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:16 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Make the use of defer mandatory
Replies: 62
Views: 23897

Re: [RFC] Make the use of defer mandatory

I agree with Arty that implementing both is probably not worth it. Just using defer is very easy to do and works in a wide range of browsers. Only opera does not support it. And while the slowdown for those who don't support it is not so nice, it's not that much of a problem either.
by igorw
Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:23 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Make the use of defer mandatory
Replies: 62
Views: 23897

Re: [RFC]Make the use of defer mandatory

Totally missed this topic. After looking into it, this seems like a really good idea. And since it's trivial to implement, we could probably even add it to 3.1. It would make a few things quite a lot easier. Browser support is pretty good, only opera is not supported. And in cases where it's not sup...
by igorw
Sun Feb 12, 2012 11:57 am
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Merged] Extensions
Replies: 113
Views: 91182

Re: [RFC|Merged] Extensions

Nils should correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this to be the case.