Search found 124 matches

by rxu
Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:46 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Quick Links
Replies: 38
Views: 30231

Re: Quick Links

Unlike for 3.0, with 3.1 quicklinks predefined search links are available on every page. So I wonder if they still should point to the whole board or it will be more usable to limit tham by forum/topic user currently browsing. Example (to be more clear): when you're browsing f=ID, clicking on any of...
by rxu
Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:59 pm
Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
Topic: [RFC|Merged] Attachments management
Replies: 38
Views: 72993

Re: [RFC|Merged] Attachments management

Here post type means post or private message.
As for the records filtering, this is rather a bug and should be reported to the tracker, I guess.
by rxu
Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:54 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: porting 3.0 mods to 3.1 extensions...
Replies: 47
Views: 29711

Re: porting 3.0 mods to 3.1 extensions...

Looking at the tutorial by Joas, it seems that creating extensions for 3.1 is rather impossible for regular community member unlike it was for 3.0 MODs.
by rxu
Fri Jun 14, 2013 2:19 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Support for IDN (IRI)
Replies: 10
Views: 14137

Re: [RFC] Support for IDN (IRI)

It looks like IDN can be checked for validity pretty easy, using function idn_to_ascii() with the IDNA_USE_STD3_RULES flag. For example: idn_to_ascii('täst.de', IDNA_USE_STD3_RULES); This code returns domain name in its IDNA ASCII form. But this code: idn_to_ascii('-täst.de', IDNA_USE_STD3_RULES); r...
by rxu
Sun Sep 16, 2012 2:38 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Support for IDN (IRI)
Replies: 10
Views: 14137

Re: [RFC] Support for IDN (IRI)

Hmm. Valid IDN characters should be NFKC Case folded, while phpBB3 messages are normalized by NFC.
So we 'd need to add NFKC casefolded message content to the parser to process IDNs, unless I've missed the way of derivation of IDN valid characters.
by rxu
Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:26 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1
Replies: 75
Views: 126699

Re: Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1

Arty , I assume that official entire dropping of subsilver2 (package+support) can't stop styles authors from creating custom styles on subsilver2's codebase, can it? In this terms, does it really matter speaking about support job then? We will have to support such custom styles adapted to 3.2/4.0/w...
by rxu
Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:23 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1
Replies: 75
Views: 126699

Re: Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1

You guys forgetting just one thing - we do drop subsilver2 from the package starting with 3.1. So there's no point to argue about that. Subsilver2 will be available as a standalone style, and I think it will be available like that for 3.2+ as well. Thus, the only point of what you're discussing here...
by rxu
Thu Aug 30, 2012 6:29 am
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1
Replies: 75
Views: 126699

Re: Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1

KnocksX, to be honest, there's no actual reason why you could call subsilver2 outdated. Technically it is not outdated, it just uses uses tabular markup, which is not outdated (see HTML5 specs). As for its design, this is up to the users taste, so we can't judge it such peremptorily. Thus, outdating...
by rxu
Wed Aug 29, 2012 2:58 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1
Replies: 75
Views: 126699

Re: Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1

imkingdavid wrote:subSilver3 is based on prosilver; it doesn't make sense to me to have two official prosilver-based styles
As for subsulver3:
This is the original prosilver style modified using css only.
So, it just inherits prosilver's template, which make even less sense to include it within the package.
by rxu
Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:35 pm
Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
Topic: [Rejected] Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1
Replies: 75
Views: 126699

Re: Removal of subsilver2 in 3.1

In fact, if subsilver2 is dropped then the only thing that will impact me personally will be I won't add subsilver2 support to my extensions and it will maybe save me some development time if I fix a bug - all positive. Well, actually it won't save you any significant amount of time if you really p...