Search found 1824 matches

by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:47 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Attachment Management
Replies: 14
Views: 14896

Re: Attachment Management

my sense is that this will not be good for the quality of discussion. Agree 100% with that. #2 well, when I try to download this, it gives me the exact filename on my local computer http://area51.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=203301#p203301 So? Would you rather some random name? What benefit does...
by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:29 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Attachment Management
Replies: 14
Views: 14896

Re: Attachment Management

Following the spirit of discussion... 1. Store by month instead of user_id Echoing what iWisdom said...why? What would be the purpose of that? 2. Rename each attachment Not sure you've looked at the current attachments feature but attachments are not stored with the original name. 3. Add watermark S...
by DavidIQ
Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:47 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)
Replies: 29
Views: 25203

Re: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)

Please at least try to think outside the box ;) I do try to think outside the box. But I also take into consideration Google's "excellent" track record for keeping private things private. I would like to be wrong of course but only time will tell I guess. It's a protocol not a service from Google. ...
by DavidIQ
Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:57 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)
Replies: 29
Views: 25203

Re: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)

marosell wrote:Please at least try to think outside the box ;)
I do try to think outside the box. But I also take into consideration Google's "excellent" track record for keeping private things private. I would like to be wrong of course but only time will tell I guess.
by DavidIQ
Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:39 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)
Replies: 29
Views: 25203

Re: Wave Federation Protocol Integration (API)

Almost sounds like a sales pitch...
marosell wrote:Please reread that sentence: Everyone could track everything they ever posted ANYWHERE on the web in their Wave Platform.
As could everyone else or maybe "Big Brother". No thanks :P
by DavidIQ
Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:23 am
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Package Management - was: Translations / styles
Replies: 36
Views: 31097

Re: Package Management - was: Translations / styles

As it is now, MOD authors should be following our guidelines if they expect their MODs to be validated into the MODDB. I don't expect this to change with phpBB4. And you just gave another reason to show a notice/warning about the MOD/Customisation not being validated by the phpBB Team.
by DavidIQ
Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:02 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Is there going to be a package manager?
Replies: 4
Views: 6736

Re: What is this forum for?

carlino1994 wrote:In this version will be implement a manager for install automatically mods?
I think that might come sooner than 4.x but don't quote me on that. AutoMOD is as best we can do right now for the 3.0.x branch.
by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:13 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.
Replies: 38
Views: 53906

Re: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.

ToonArmy wrote:What and write our own cross browser JS library? I think not.
Writing some functions to handle simple AJAX that are cross-browser friendly isn't that hard :P If you get into more complex events and features then adding jQuery would be the way to go of course.
by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:56 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.
Replies: 38
Views: 53906

Re: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.

I think my reason for including jQuery here was to maybe have further discussion on what to do with it. For instance it could be a possibility to do some auto-complete in the search fields kind of like what Google does. Or making a post be rendered smoothly as opposed to just displaying it right aft...
by DavidIQ
Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:32 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.
Replies: 38
Views: 53906

Re: AJAX, jQuery, et. al.

You don't need jQuery to do AJAX calls. Likewise you don't need AJAX to perform jQuery functions. You can combine the two and create some "pretty" things on the screen like fade outs or smooth auto-completes, etc. but they're both separate.