Search found 182 matches

by ecwpa
Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:16 pm
Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
Topic: [RFC] Ability to @mention specific users in posts
Replies: 241
Views: 153227

Re: [RFC] Ability to @mention specific users in posts

{user:xxx} links to the user with user name (and/or user ID?) xxx. {forum:xxx} links to the forum with forum ID xxx (displaying the forum's name in the link). {topic:xxx} links to the topic with topic ID xxx (displaying the topic's title in the link). {post:xxx} links to the post with post ID xxx (...
by ecwpa
Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:27 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

Am I missing something? callumacrae asked why I need IDs, and I explained how lots of JS libraries requiere HTML IDs for them to work. I'm just answering his question.

EXreaction's solution is pretty good, it will work for me, unless JS is disabled, in that case I'm not sure what would happen.
by ecwpa
Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:51 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

The carousel uses ID, check the first line:

Code: Select all

<div id="myCarousel" class="carousel slide">
If you remove id="myCarousel" it won't work. I know it could probably be rewritten to work without IDs but that's how most of these libraries work, this is the standard, not the exception.
by ecwpa
Sun Dec 09, 2012 5:52 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

Check my previous posts on this thread, that's what I've been discussing. The example given was JS charts and image carousels.
by ecwpa
Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:48 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

Why not? In most of these JS libraries you really need an unique identifier. Not having a way to be sure it's unique is asking for trouble.
by ecwpa
Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:16 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

That's a very interesting way to solve it. Thanks.
by ecwpa
Fri Dec 07, 2012 9:59 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

I see. As brunoais said, why is the id required? Javascript selectors should work fine on either the id, class, data, or other parameters, are you sure these libraries only work off of specific id tags (could you link to an example if one does)? I believe you can use the current custom bbcode syste...
by ecwpa
Fri Dec 07, 2012 7:50 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

Javascript, as I mentioned, the main use would be any library that uses element ID. JS charts, JS galleries, etc, there're a lot of uses for it.
by ecwpa
Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:19 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

You're right, I probabbly didn't make myself clear. Yes, I mean something like the second example. For example, let's say a div: [div=1]content[/div] Which could output something like: <div id="1">content</div> With this I can use "1" as div ID to trigger an event with javascript. Now, what if I wan...
by ecwpa
Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:19 pm
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom
Replies: 44
Views: 23080

Re: [RFC] BBCode permissions and moving to all custom

Are you talking about altering phpBB's code? how's that trivial?

The point of a RFC like that is exactly not doing that.