Acyd Burn wrote: Updating Beta to RC/Final releases
Even if an update path is given with this beta, we begin to fully support them with the first release candidate.
Please be aware that your test installation may need to be replaced/removed if a new beta is announced.
Search found 411 matches
- Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:26 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: need to update my phpbb2...thinking of beta 4 :)
- Replies: 16
- Views: 19007
Re: need to update my phpbb2...thinking of beta 4 :)
- Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:44 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
- Topic: Trouble Including Files in Templates
- Replies: 26
- Views: 26492
Re: Trouble Including Files in Templates
the way he said it it was inside the temp dir oO
- Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:11 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: phpBB Multi Forums with subdomains script
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7138
Re: phpBB Multi Forums with subdomains script
well.. there is a difference, but that is if you want to alow FTP acces
- Wed Dec 06, 2006 11:10 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
- Replies: 27
- Views: 61106
Re: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
that listing was just some ranting code
2. but you are hinting to someone to make it for you, else you would have dropped this a long time ago
3. duh...
2. but you are hinting to someone to make it for you, else you would have dropped this a long time ago
3. duh...
- Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:26 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Styling
- Topic: no more avatars in memberlist?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 16120
Re: no more avatars in memberlist?
avatars can help in identifying the user you want to find 
but on the other hand > bandwidth increase
but on the other hand > bandwidth increase
- Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:23 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
- Replies: 27
- Views: 61106
Re: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
that's if you would use the custom bbcode..
then, before you start spouting things I suggest you at least *try* em out. from the way I posted it it would seem obvious the code would screw up. now, if the BBCode for tables would have been installed, that table would parse. why? because it looks for ...
then, before you start spouting things I suggest you at least *try* em out. from the way I posted it it would seem obvious the code would screw up. now, if the BBCode for tables would have been installed, that table would parse. why? because it looks for ...
Re: php
*gasp*
Alot of Web Hosts still use php4 too, as it's still supported, and far less finicky than php5. Considering when php5 came out, alot of webapps completely broke when using it compared to v4.
those are webaps based on classes ( or commonly said OOP )
I never really had trouble with it ...
- Tue Dec 05, 2006 3:39 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
- Replies: 27
- Views: 61106
Re: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
omg.. that last part, I hope you didn't meant it, did you? of COURSE it won't screw up Olympus ;x ever heard of htmlentities() and or htmlspecialchars() ( or some other one, don't know which Olympus uses )
I did forget to add that I planted that code like that on purpose.
<table>
<th>
<td>cell ...
I did forget to add that I planted that code like that on purpose.
<table>
<th>
<td>cell ...
- Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:29 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
- Replies: 27
- Views: 61106
Re: Custom BBCode - still missing a basic feature, tables.
woot!
wootz0rt
meh, just playing around a bit.. anyway, most people who visit forums are people who don't have even the slightest idea what a table is. much less what html is or means. so, majority is against. aside from that, people will start to screw up, because they do not know how ...
- Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:10 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: For Olympus! -livejournal
- Replies: 28
- Views: 33008
Re: For Olympus! -livejournal
that.. would suck. aside from taken usernames, let's focus on some other problems:
who is going to run the gigantic database?
who says I would want all those users on my forum?
a forum specialized in cars doesn't want any script-only members
that's not a decision for anyone to make. if you want ...
who is going to run the gigantic database?
who says I would want all those users on my forum?
a forum specialized in cars doesn't want any script-only members
that's not a decision for anyone to make. if you want ...