Search found 291 matches
- Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:31 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: AJAX Multiple File Upload
- Replies: 10
- Views: 21940
Re: Attachment Password & Multiple File Upload
You can upload multiple attachments. As to attachment passwords, use permissions.
- Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:29 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Connection to phpBB Customisation Database
- Replies: 7
- Views: 14039
Re: Connection to phpBB Customisation Database
If it's not in the first release I doubt it will make an appearance.EXreaction wrote:This will probably be done for 3.1 (maybe not the first release, but it's possible)
- Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:39 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Rename MSNM to WLM
- Replies: 24
- Views: 68421
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Rename MSNM to WLM
The prosilver shades look wrong, probably just my eyes and monitors.naderman wrote:Mind explaining that?
- Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:43 am
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Git hooks
- Replies: 53
- Views: 112205
Re: Git hooks
Better validation: http://github.com/cs278/phpbb3/compare/ ... ;git-tools
- Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:47 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Rename MSNM to WLM
- Replies: 24
- Views: 68421
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Rename MSNM to WLM
The image doesn't look right to me.
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:25 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 450773
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
A point that I believe was not mentioned is that subsilver requires support from the code to do certain things, for example attachment uploading popups. If subsilver support is removed from the official tree and these code bits are subsequently removed as 'unnecessary' (since prosilver does not use ...
- Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:10 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 450773
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
It would be strange to have an option for this in the ACP since not every style offers the option. In some styles, it wouldn't work at all. I am all for better UI, but that's actually what we attempted with listing the author details on the right (so that the important stuff is right where your ...
- Sat Jul 31, 2010 2:49 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 450773
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
Probably not.Nelsaidi wrote:And will it still be supported for 3.2?
- Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:58 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 450773
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
I very much favour this option as well. But the question is how do we want to keep maintaining it? If we want to guarantee proper support we need to keep it in the repository. We can then still exclude it from the standard distribution at release time. As for the updater, yes we should definately ...
- Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:44 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: SiteMap
- Replies: 11
- Views: 23648
Re: Site Map
I believe the request is for XML sitemaps for search engines, not a sitemap for humans.