Why does 3.0.8 have any bearing on 3.1?Meis2M wrote:it is better phpbb 3.0.8 dont come.
Suddenly phpBB 3.1 come and It is Christmas gifts from Santa Claus
Search found 291 matches
- Fri Sep 24, 2010 5:31 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: when will phpBB 3.0.8 come out?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15449
Re: when will phpBB 3.0.8 come out?
- Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:08 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Removing config.php from git repository
- Replies: 17
- Views: 26924
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:17 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Removing config.php from git repository
- Replies: 17
- Views: 26924
Re: Removing config.php from git repository
It should have been removed a long time ago imo. Perhaps we can use .gitignore as a stop gap.
- Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:07 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Git hooks
- Replies: 53
- Views: 112268
Re: Git hooks
That's a nice solution, but yes I've already fixed it unless there is further issues.nn- wrote:if test $(cat $file |cut -c 80- |wc -w) -ne 0; then
echo $file has lines exceeding 79 chars
fi
- Tue Sep 14, 2010 10:18 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Local time handling by Javascript
- Replies: 13
- Views: 38342
Re: [RFC] Local time handling by Javascript
I might be mistaken but aren't the data attributes introduced in the HTML 5 spec?
Yes, that is correct. But this is phpBB 3.2 so it might be feasible, plus it's already supported by all browsers (afaik). I guess we'll have to see if we want to go down that route.
http://dev.w3.org/html5/html ...
Yes, that is correct. But this is phpBB 3.2 so it might be feasible, plus it's already supported by all browsers (afaik). I guess we'll have to see if we want to go down that route.
http://dev.w3.org/html5/html ...
- Tue Sep 07, 2010 10:38 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Git hooks
- Replies: 53
- Views: 112268
Re: Git hooks
http://tracker.phpbb.com/browse/PHPBB3-9808eviL3 wrote:Can we have that section commented out until a cross-platform solution is found? I'd really like to re-enable my git plugins.
- Mon Sep 06, 2010 12:04 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Include and use jQuery (originally for 3.2)
- Replies: 74
- Views: 168707
Re: [RFC] Include and use jQuery
Yes to including jQuery :-)
No to loading from Google (or another CDN). While google's servers may be reliable, my connection to them is not. Particularly here in China, various Google services are often arbitrarily blocked. All JS should be served from the phpBB instance itself.
The loading ...
No to loading from Google (or another CDN). While google's servers may be reliable, my connection to them is not. Particularly here in China, various Google services are often arbitrarily blocked. All JS should be served from the phpBB instance itself.
The loading ...
- Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:13 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] WYSIWYG editor
- Replies: 52
- Views: 159313
Re: [RFC] WYSIWYG editor
Hi there,
i [dev] now over 1 year a kind of private phpbb-wysiwyg and i think, i'am a genius in some things.
But, nevermind/anyway: Here are the main points , and here* i stucked over,
but it's not impossible: i know that 4 shure.
Minimum: Support of Main BBCodes
*Auto-Integration of any ...
i [dev] now over 1 year a kind of private phpbb-wysiwyg and i think, i'am a genius in some things.
But, nevermind/anyway: Here are the main points , and here* i stucked over,
but it's not impossible: i know that 4 shure.
Minimum: Support of Main BBCodes
*Auto-Integration of any ...
- Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:12 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Accepted] Coding Guideline Modifications
- Replies: 79
- Views: 155867
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Coding Guideline Modifications
Could we use the build script to set the @version information to the release version, it's always been kind of handy as a quick check.
- Thu Sep 02, 2010 8:08 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Login after register
- Replies: 23
- Views: 61999
Re: Login after register
Because it was posted here.keith10456 wrote:I'm curious as to why this was bumped to 4.0 instead of 3.2 (or 3.1). Just wondering...