Development Discussion Board

Sure, if you want to refactor some legacy part, feel free to do that. I would say unless you change something in behavior there isn't really a need to post an RFC (of course if you looking for feedback it is probably the way to go). I would also like to note that it would be great if you could keep ...

xiri wrote: ↑Sun Nov 06, 2016 10:29 am Why 3.2 version of parsing is better?
Thanks in advance!

That is just the format that the TextFormatter uses. How one stores data is not really makes anything better or worse, the reason why 3.2's BBCode parsing is better is just simply because the features that comes from the new TextFormatter.

Here I do have to disagree. The refactoring/re-coding of the *CPs benefits first of all phpBB itself... this topic touches both sides: phpBB and extension writers (so to say, at the end of all: phpBB itself). ;) I'm not sure on exactly what we're disagreeing on, I guess it is not really important a...

Well, this bit about multiple major releases it's something discouraging. It is, however as I said earlier, as an extension author you shouldn't really worry about that part, as you would have the new *CP framework, which would allow you to write your extension's *CP parts in the new framework. Als...

There are plans to refactor the ACP (as basically everything else that is in a front-facing file). Probably when someone will have some architectural plans, then you can expect to see an RFC posted somewhere in this forum. As VSE said, the *CPs are pretty big beasts so it may take a lot of time/mult...

CarpCharacin wrote: ↑Thu Sep 15, 2016 4:53 pm I think that for 3.3/4.0 we should have fontawesome topic icons and forum icons also.

As far as I know the plan is not to use any font icons.

leschek wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:03 pm Can I translate words between tags <info>--send-email</info> (in this case --send-email) in language file: language/xy/cli.php?

Example: To optionally send an email to the new user, use the <info>--send-email</info> option

EDIT: I guess it shouldn't be translated.

it shouldn't

If anyone has any suggestions on what might be improved on the viewonline page, now would be a great time to share. Or if you just want it to look and work exactly the same in 3.3 as well.

Ticket is here, but you really should comment here not there if possible.

Thanks for any input in advance.

Rebecka wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2016 5:04 pm Both look good. What do you mean by we are using twemoji currently?

phpBB 3.2 supports emojis, and it currently uses the twemoji package to render them.

We could just use EmojiOne or Twemoji both for smilies and emojis (we are using twemoji for emojis i think currently, but both packages are supported by the textformater, so it is fairly easy to integrate either).