Search found 158 matches

by CHItA
Wed May 09, 2018 10:40 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: [GSoC] Chat-like PMs interface :: discussion before coding starts
Replies: 25
Views: 6857

Re: [GSoC] Chat-like PMs interface :: discussion before coding starts

Yup, I wanted to start working on it but I was told someone was working on the module system so didn't want to duplicate work. I will look into it again soonish.
by CHItA
Tue May 08, 2018 9:48 pm
Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
Topic: Support for Emojis
Replies: 66
Views: 56517

Re: Support for Emojis

Either way, the only values available for templating are the original input and the EmojiOne-style sequence, e.g. 1f3f3-1f308 . One thing that might be an option is converting from the :format: to unicode first. That would make it possible to use any emoji imageset as the output. Not sure whether y...
by CHItA
Tue May 08, 2018 8:33 pm
Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
Topic: Support for Emojis
Replies: 66
Views: 56517

Re: Support for Emojis

Each emoji set uses a different filename scheme, which makes it much harder to switch from a one to another unless you maintain your own fork. EmojiOne: 1f3f3-1f308.png Twemoji: 1f3f3-fe0f-200d-1f308.svg Noto: emoji_u1f3f3_200d_1f308.svg Currently, the value that's stored in the post's data is 1f3f...
by CHItA
Tue May 08, 2018 12:47 pm
Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
Topic: Support for Emojis
Replies: 66
Views: 56517

Re: Support for Emojis

I guess we could just replace EmojiOne with twemoji or Noto. I think we can just overwrite the template for the textformater's Emoji plugin, and pull in the twemoji SVGs or PNGs instead, I assume that would be a quick fix (and it is CC-BY 4.0). Not sure what we would need to do for Noto. For serving...
by CHItA
Wed May 02, 2018 1:55 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach
Replies: 61
Views: 26516

Re: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach

Yeah sure, but when should we throw out jquery if not with the new theme. Also, we could probably add some code to make it easier to manage JS libraries but that is probably another discussion.
by CHItA
Wed May 02, 2018 11:05 am
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach
Replies: 61
Views: 26516

Re: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach

Okay, seems reasonable, however, if vue can do what jQuery can then we could just use that, basically to only use as many libraries that we actually do need (so if Vue could replace jQuery then we could just write everything in Vue).
by CHItA
Wed May 02, 2018 6:29 am
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach
Replies: 61
Views: 26516

Re: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach

My point is that as far as I know, we only use jQuery to toggle classes and select elements. Not super sure about this, so I might be wrong, however, basically all the browsers we want to support should support JS features that would make it simple to do this (e.g. they have querySelector etc). Vue ...
by CHItA
Tue May 01, 2018 10:33 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach
Replies: 61
Views: 26516

Re: [NEW THEME] 4. JS frameworks & approach

I would vote for droping jQuery, and using pure JS instead (basically jQuery shouldn't really have anything anymore that is harder to do in pure JS). For the more complicated stuff we could use Vue if there is a need for it.
by CHItA
Tue May 01, 2018 5:11 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: EU-DSGVO or GDPR Aspects on Development
Replies: 13
Views: 5142

Re: EU-DSGVO or GDPR Aspects on Development

However: It may be , that DSGVO suggests or forces us to have the cookies as "opt in" . As you guys have cookie consent from Insites implemented, and they have also an opt-in option: Is it planned to implement this function? And, of course, if the user is not accepting cookies, to block all cookies...
by CHItA
Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:17 pm
Forum: General Development Discussion
Topic: [GSoC] Database Explorer within ACP
Replies: 6
Views: 3353

Re: [GSoC] Database Explorer within ACP

I don't see this to be a good idea for phpBB. phpMyAdmin is whole project dedicated to do just that and only for MySQL. This would be just too much of a hassle to maintain, and honestly I don't really see this being widely used as you describe it. IMO most admins would just use it as a replacement o...