Development Discussion Board

By suggesting 2000px, might as well remain at fluid width then (since most screens are less than 2000px anyways).
But that's the point... it's only intended for users with huge displays. I personally don't see a problem with the way the system is setout now with exception to those huge displays ...

960px seems way too low.
You're right. The change proposed is 1152px.
:? It's a better number, but I honestly think it would be better at 2,000px (just after 1920px) simply on the basis that HD monitors get their widescreen resolution, then uber-screens can have a limit that isn't overkill ...

As a passing user, I don't make much criticism to the thought of having a default max-width setting, but why 960px? As someone who has a 'HD-Monitor' at 1920px wide, I can read easily most forums including this one just fine (even if it is at a little stretch). If you want to set a max-width setting ...

I stumbled upon this thread through a search because I wanted to automatically truncate quotes more than my set limit on the forum (which is set to one on mine).

As a site administrator, I'm not bothered about changing the styling or the way it looks particularly on the forum because at the end of ...