Search found 382 matches

by Louis7777
Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:29 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?
Replies: 115
Views: 173376

Re: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?

Imo there's no need for an entire new theme and we should simply improve on the current theme. With things like: - HTML5 Elements - Smilies in a dropdown box and/or a WYSIWYG editor - Sprites, SVG icons and SVG forum/topic imageset - Remove CSS @import, organize and improve CSS (less files hopefully...
by Louis7777
Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:18 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?
Replies: 115
Views: 173376

Re: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?

I already said the go2top things are probably the only real use of IDs. There can be many unique elements in a template. Usually there are, many. You can have that by using a class as well and not reusing it. What about speed? 1. Speed regarding how fast the browser matches an element. 2. Speed reg...
by Louis7777
Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:20 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?
Replies: 115
Views: 173376

Re: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?

Yes please elaborate! 1. You can have unique elements e.g. one overall header, one overall footer, one container for a go2top arrow. 2. They make it faster for the browser to match an element (depending on how they are used and while keeping in mind that CSS selectors are matched by reading them fr...
by Louis7777
Mon Jun 13, 2016 1:41 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?
Replies: 115
Views: 173376

Re: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?

What exactly should I elaborate? Just its a better practice to not use ID for elements to style them, instead we should use classes only because classes are reusable. IDs are not. IDs also have a very high specificity which should be avoidable. You said to never use IDs in the markup. The high spec...
by Louis7777
Sun Jun 12, 2016 9:19 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?
Replies: 115
Views: 173376

Re: New Style for phpBB 3.3 ?

Rhino.Freak wrote:
Tue Jun 07, 2016 10:30 pm
Whatever style you make and whenever you make, just never use any id in the markup. It's really useless and has no benefits over classes. Classes ftw.
Please elaborate.
by Louis7777
Thu May 12, 2016 7:02 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Here is what I think
Replies: 10
Views: 14573

Re: Here is what I think

[...] Because of that interest in forums is going down. [...] I believe that could easily change. Also - call me crazy - I believe that phpBB could compete with WordPress. Because after all it's not so different. Because content is king. Because customers would like to have social features. And cre...
by Louis7777
Thu May 12, 2016 2:15 pm
Forum: [3.x] Discussion
Topic: Here is what I think
Replies: 10
Views: 14573

Re: Here is what I think

pethol wrote:
Tue May 10, 2016 11:09 pm
If I want to see statistics - I want to see them in my ACP. I don't have the need to 'show off'.
I want to be able to see how big is the community in which I am participating and how many are its active users.
by Louis7777
Sun May 08, 2016 2:16 pm
Forum: [3.x] Style Development
Topic: Which IE versions should we kill?
Replies: 98
Views: 177790

Re: Which IE versions should we kill?

dude111 wrote:
Sun May 08, 2016 9:21 am
(Im using MyIE2 in front but MyIE2 is only an IE add-on)
I'm vegan. And I crossfit.
by Louis7777
Wed May 04, 2016 1:27 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Human Readable URLs
Replies: 132
Views: 197861

Re: [RFC] Human Readable URLs

Ticket: https://tracker.phpbb.com/browse/PHPBB3-14623 Although off topic what are the ramifications of this f parameter suddenly vanishing from all topic URLs? Wouldn't this have a negative effect on SEO? We are already using canonical URLs without it which means that - as far as SEO is concerned - ...
by Louis7777
Wed May 04, 2016 12:40 am
Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
Topic: [RFC] Human Readable URLs
Replies: 132
Views: 197861

Re: [RFC] Human Readable URLs

DavidIQ wrote:
Wed May 04, 2016 12:17 am
Do we have a ticket for that?
Which one? The "ghost user" bug? Nope.