I know it's not really needed, but it feels more complete that way
Search found 391 matches
- Sat Apr 12, 2014 1:24 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: @charset "utf-8"; in every stylesheet
- Replies: 3
- Views: 21178
@charset "utf-8"; in every stylesheet
How about including the encoding @charset "utf-8"; at the top of every stylesheet?
I know it's not really needed, but it feels more complete that way
I know it's not really needed, but it feels more complete that way
- Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:45 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Move "print view" and "email friend" into the topic tools
- Replies: 17
- Views: 31329
[RFC] Move "print view" and "email friend" into the topic tools
Printing and emailing a friend about a topic are actions associated with a specific topic so how about moving those icons inside the topic tools dropdown list?
- Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 31400
Re: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
Ok someone please tell me - why is the "shiv" needed? And why a simplebrunoais wrote: The shiv's will take care of years old outdated browsers.
document.createElement("nameOfElementHere");
won't do the job?- Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:53 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: disable directory indexes with .htaccess
- Replies: 7
- Views: 30134
disable directory indexes with .htaccess
Add
It may be of help if you or the user forgets to put in place a blank index file.
Options -Indexes
(in a commented line?) to the .htaccess at the root?It may be of help if you or the user forgets to put in place a blank index file.
- Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:34 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 31400
Re: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
Again, why use html5shiv?
document.createElement("nameOfElementHere");
creates a block element that will work like a <div>.- Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:38 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 31400
Re: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
Yeah, I saw that at the w3schools site, but is it necessary? I mean what more do we need other than a simple "createElement"?
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:27 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
- Replies: 20
- Views: 31400
[RFC] HTML5 Semantic Elements
I searched for other RFCs before posting this, using the keywords "html5" and "semantic", but I could only find this relevant topic: Prosilver Overhaul/Modernization
Most of the discussion there is from 2011 and it was even debated whether HTML5 should be used in 3.1. Someone made the specific ...
Most of the discussion there is from 2011 and it was even debated whether HTML5 should be used in 3.1. Someone made the specific ...
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 3:37 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Search engine optimization: canonical link elements
- Replies: 16
- Views: 68398
Re: [RFC] Search engine optimization: canonical link elements
Was this developed at any point or has it been forgotten?
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 2:57 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: FAQ Manager
- Replies: 45
- Views: 91206
Re: [RFC] FAQ Manager
Well you can easily add the rules to the FAQ if you wish with this change so you don't need an entirely different page for it.
I like to make my websites unique and informative so I always customize the FAQ, Terms of use, Privacy Policy, BBCode guide and sometimes I write additional information ...
I like to make my websites unique and informative so I always customize the FAQ, Terms of use, Privacy Policy, BBCode guide and sometimes I write additional information ...
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:54 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Edit/Add/Remove/Move Multiple smilies
- Replies: 8
- Views: 19312
Re: [RFC] Edit/Add/Remove/Move Multiple smilies
The "delete" and "move" aren't - those are very time-saving.