I personally don't like those dropwdowns at all. And the one at XenForo displays the forum title in the dropdown... why would they do that when the title is already on the left... it's so ugly...
Although I'm mostly fine with displaying only level 1, I believe there would be forum cases where I ...
Search found 391 matches
- Wed May 07, 2014 6:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Limit the subforums in legend to 1 level.
- Replies: 37
- Views: 67823
- Wed May 07, 2014 11:36 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Limit the subforums in legend to 1 level.
- Replies: 37
- Views: 67823
Re: [RFC] Limit the subforums in legend to 1 level.
What is the practice that others have followed? IPB, XenForo, vBulletin, SMF, MyBB etc. Some people may consider it a nice feature to display all the subforums in the legend, so if other vendors offer it, then we shouldn't take it away.
Is this RFC about adding a new option to control the display ...
Is this RFC about adding a new option to control the display ...
- Tue May 06, 2014 2:46 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.1.0 Beta3 released
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6834
Re: phpBB 3.1.0 Beta3 released
Better thank their mothers who raised them. xD
- Mon May 05, 2014 9:39 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: Cleanup Topic Actions section
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11704
Re: Cleanup Topic Actions section
In my opinion we should think of how to move " Mark forums read ", " Mark subforums read " and " Mark topics read " out of the way while maintaining their functionality. Perhaps replace them with icons and tooltips or idk what else...
In any case, I like how it all looks hanakin, except for the ...
In any case, I like how it all looks hanakin, except for the ...
- Sat May 03, 2014 1:18 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: Question
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9774
Re: Question
That's what the RFC (Request For Change) forums are for.
I always thought it stood for "request for comment" ;)
Yep...that's another representation of the acronym but that's not what it is here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_change
;)
"Publish your own request for comments or ...
I always thought it stood for "request for comment" ;)
Yep...that's another representation of the acronym but that's not what it is here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_change
;)
"Publish your own request for comments or ...
- Fri May 02, 2014 11:32 pm
- Forum: General Development Discussion
- Topic: State of Area51
- Replies: 147
- Views: 231067
Re: State of Area51
It should be an equation, although it seems impossible to solve:VSE wrote:Is that PC speak for empty the browser cache?prototech wrote:Ctrl + F5.
C*t*r*l + 5*F = x
- Fri May 02, 2014 10:26 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: disable directory indexes with .htaccess
- Replies: 7
- Views: 30134
Re: disable directory indexes with .htaccess
Hmm you are right I guess.
Well, simply think of whether it would be ok to have it in a commented line preceded by some notes and perhaps a warning (otherwise let's move this to the "rejected" section?).
Well, simply think of whether it would be ok to have it in a commented line preceded by some notes and perhaps a warning (otherwise let's move this to the "rejected" section?).
- Fri May 02, 2014 1:24 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Hide forum (f) variable from topic url
- Replies: 40
- Views: 166135
Re: [RFC] Hide forum (f) variable from topic url
Yes, like I said, in 3.0 it was required. This board runs on 3.1
Well, I don't know in what way it was required, but below there's a global announcement from a 3.0 forum that I chose from the phpBB showcase:
https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=113882
https://forum.videolan.org ...
Well, I don't know in what way it was required, but below there's a global announcement from a 3.0 forum that I chose from the phpBB showcase:
https://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=113882
https://forum.videolan.org ...
- Fri May 02, 2014 1:00 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Hide forum (f) variable from topic url
- Replies: 40
- Views: 166135
Re: [RFC] Hide forum (f) variable from topic url
Well, this is a global announcement:paulus wrote:In 3.0 it was required for global announcements.
https://area51.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopi ... 99&t=30432
https://area51.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=30432
It can be accessed with or without the f=
- Fri May 02, 2014 8:56 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Hide forum (f) variable from topic url
- Replies: 40
- Views: 166135
[RFC] Hide forum (f) variable from topic url
This RFC steps on the following:
Why forum variable is in URL?
[RFC] Search engine optimization: canonical link elements
Description
--------------
Hide or stop advertising the f variable in topic URLs. That is to say, remove it from the links at viewforum and by extension from viewtopic ...
Why forum variable is in URL?
[RFC] Search engine optimization: canonical link elements
Description
--------------
Hide or stop advertising the f variable in topic URLs. That is to say, remove it from the links at viewforum and by extension from viewtopic ...