Search found 45 matches
- Tue Mar 01, 2016 9:07 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-14323 / PHPBB3-14332 - Link shortening
- Replies: 28
- Views: 98269
Re: PHPBB3-14323 / PHPBB3-14332 - Link shortening
@Nicofuma The 3.2.x branch differs from the 3.1.x branch. I think this line change should be reverted but I'm not familiar with the bug it was meant to fix; Reverting it would probably introduce a regression, I guess? https://tracker.phpbb.com/browse/PHPBB3-13377
https://github.com/phpbb/phpbb ...
- Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-14323 / PHPBB3-14332 - Link shortening
- Replies: 28
- Views: 98269
Re: PHPBB3-14323 / PHPBB3-14332 - Link shortening
Well I think of the url tag as an explicit call to the parser that "here really comes a link, so pay attention!". That I wanted to show the link in his whole length.
You could also ask why we need a url bbcode anymore then if they have the same behaviour.
I don't know, I just like the old behaviour ...
You could also ask why we need a url bbcode anymore then if they have the same behaviour.
I don't know, I just like the old behaviour ...
- Sat Oct 24, 2015 12:10 am
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-13803 / PHPBB3-13891 - Reparsing text
- Replies: 65
- Views: 180571
Re: PHPBB3-13803 / PHPBB3-13891 - Reparsing text
Sorry, I might be a bit late for this, but...
I just looked through the reparser. (like I said - a bit late ^^)
The tables are defined as constants, which will result in another BC break, if we want to get rid of constants at some point. (I think this is the final goal of all this?)
Why would it ...
I just looked through the reparser. (like I said - a bit late ^^)
The tables are defined as constants, which will result in another BC break, if we want to get rid of constants at some point. (I think this is the final goal of all this?)
Why would it ...
- Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:03 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Contact-us needs the anti-spam-plugin integrated
- Replies: 8
- Views: 49841
Re: [RFC] Contact-us needs the anti-spam-plugin integrated
The issue is really just the captcha I think. People, who just can't read the captcha have no way to contact the board administration then and we can't do that.
I don't know if Q&A captcha would be okay, but if it is, we should think about that.
I don't know if Q&A captcha would be okay, but if it is, we should think about that.
- Fri Oct 02, 2015 8:56 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: What can you say about Flarum?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 76149
Re: What can you say about Flarum?
Well... I wouldn't consider Flarum a forum software. To me it's a software for creating a platform for online discussions.
It's just too confusing and messy to me.
I like that timeline when scrolling through a topic, though.
It's just too confusing and messy to me.
I like that timeline when scrolling through a topic, though.
- Sat Aug 29, 2015 10:21 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: PHP requirement
- Replies: 46
- Views: 243629
Re: PHP requirement
If we use specific functions or language features which are not available in some php version, then it's okay to bump the version, but to bump the requirement so we could use some functions or language features is not okay IMHO.
I don't get it. You have to bump the requirements before you can ...
- Thu Aug 27, 2015 5:19 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: PHP requirement
- Replies: 46
- Views: 243629
Re: PHP requirement
As I already said: I'm not against a version bump to 5.4 for 3.2.
I just think we shouldn't set the php to require just because the current required php version is EOL'd. If we use specific functions or language features which are not available in some php version, then it's okay to bump the ...
I just think we shouldn't set the php to require just because the current required php version is EOL'd. If we use specific functions or language features which are not available in some php version, then it's okay to bump the ...
- Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:23 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: PHP requirement
- Replies: 46
- Views: 243629
Re: PHP requirement
Do you know how many of our users still use PHP 5.3? If there are too many I wouldn't push the requirement then. 
Otherwise, it's ok for me.
Otherwise, it's ok for me.
- Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: PHP requirement
- Replies: 46
- Views: 243629
Re: PHP requirement
Why?
- Sat Aug 22, 2015 3:48 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Remove sid-link value from posts
- Replies: 19
- Views: 43354
Re: Remove sid-link value from posts
No, because that would take forever but we want to add a cron job for reparsing everything. I don't know the status of that, though.Dragosvr92 wrote: Fri Aug 21, 2015 3:22 pm I guess this will only remove the sid from newly made posts. But, can you add the function to reparse all old posts to remove it,in the database_update.php?