Search found 49 matches
- Thu Dec 08, 2011 2:09 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Skip post confirmation page
- Replies: 57
- Views: 147403
[RFC] Skip post confirmation page
I think the post confirmation page isn't necessary and merely adds a delay to the user experience. Could this page be removed? Instead, the user could be instantly redirected to his post.
- Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:34 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
- Replies: 48
- Views: 76424
Re: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
Sure. If activation is disabled just skip the first form (and activation) and add the email field to the second form.
- Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:32 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] SFTP support
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11578
Re: [RFC] SFTP support
Ah, like that. I read naderman's statement the wrong way.
Anyway, wouldn't SFTP support effectively give the webserver permission to write to the files it executes?
Anyway, wouldn't SFTP support effectively give the webserver permission to write to the files it executes?
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:16 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
- Replies: 48
- Views: 76424
Re: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
Why would you require that?imkingdavid wrote:Either way, they should be required to enter a new password to finalize registration.
- Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:00 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
- Replies: 48
- Views: 76424
Re: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
We ultimately there should only be one email required for activating/logging in initially. If we have one form for just the email address, which sends an activation link, and then the second form for the username, which then sends a random password, that is just extra work to have to keep checking ...
- Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:18 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] SFTP support
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11578
Re: [RFC] SFTP support
Why not?naderman wrote:Proper file permissions do not allow the webserver to write to the files it executes.
- Tue Dec 06, 2011 3:32 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
- Replies: 48
- Views: 76424
Re: [RFC] Registration & Login Overhaul
I agree with being able to login with either username or email, but there are some cases in which users might have multiple usernames associated with one email address that, which could become problematic. If multiple rows match, you could fallback to matching on username only. I think using JS for...
- Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:31 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] SFTP support
- Replies: 7
- Views: 11578
Re: [RFC] SFTP support
(S)FTP access looks like an ugly work around. Why can't file permissions be set properly?
- Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:59 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Usability: Login on registration / verification after registration
- Replies: 25
- Views: 32945
Re: [RFC] Usability: Login on registration
+1Erik Frèrejean wrote:Why not simply login the user when he clicks the activation link?
One might even go one step further and do registration after email address verification. Would avoid unregistered users.