Search found 49 matches
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:37 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Skip post confirmation page
- Replies: 57
- Views: 147374
Re: [RFC] Skip post confirmation page
Oops.. There's still one after deleting something though.
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:07 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Last Post format
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8758
Last Post format
Last post has the format "by XTF #\nThu Apr 30, 2015 6:43 pm" Where does one want to go if one clicks here? To the last post.. However, the # target is tiny while the user target is much larger, which doesn't make any sense. IMO the entire cell should be a link to the last post. Using X da...
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:48 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Skip post confirmation page
- Replies: 57
- Views: 147374
Re: [RFC] Skip post confirmation page
What about 3.2?
Could this be moved into a forum to be considered for 3.2?
Could this be moved into a forum to be considered for 3.2?
- Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:39 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Delete "Confirm e-mail address"
- Replies: 81
- Views: 299667
Re: [RFC|Merged] Delete "Confirm e-mail address"
So?
Not yet approved I guess. :p
Not yet approved I guess. :p
- Wed Feb 19, 2014 9:14 am
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Enable gzip by default
- Replies: 18
- Views: 55813
Re: [RFC] Enable gzip by default
Has gzip CPU usage been quantified?
Is gzip the only setting that's disabled to avoid CPU usage?
Is gzip the only setting that's disabled to avoid CPU usage?
- Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:26 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Enable gzip by default
- Replies: 18
- Views: 55813
Re: [RFC] Enable gzip by default
You really don't know what you're talking about, do you?Master_Cylinder wrote:How do you determine "typical?" Is typical a forum with a lot of images or one with few?
- Tue Feb 11, 2014 8:30 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Don't require table prefix
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6886
Re: Don't require table prefix
True, but I'm not requesting the prefix to be empty by default.
- Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:12 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Enable gzip by default
- Replies: 18
- Views: 55813
Re: [RFC] Enable gzip by default
Bandwidth is frequently an issue on shared hosting as well. How much extra CPU time does gzip really take?
- Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:50 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Don't require table prefix
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6886
Re: Don't require table prefix
Don't table names get quoted?
- Sun Feb 09, 2014 10:42 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Enable gzip by default
- Replies: 18
- Views: 55813
[RFC] Enable gzip by default
Could gzip be enabled by default? It improves page load time (and saves bandwidth), downside *might* be higher CPU usage. But CPU usage is rarely a problem and I think enabling it by default is better.