Search found 97 matches
- Mon Jul 31, 2017 10:19 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Reports as UCP module
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2038
Re: Reports as UCP module
an Admin could remove the permission if he did not want it, and if it did not have a permission then he could just disable the module - which really would be little difference to having an extension The main difference is: by default the module would be activated and the permission be given - there...
- Thu Jul 27, 2017 1:24 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Reports as UCP module
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2038
Re: Reports as UCP module
And which administrator would install an extension that he or his moderators don't need? My point is that the current implementation is only a one way useful thing.
- Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:55 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Reports as UCP module
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2038
Reports as UCP module
There are two disadvantages of the current report handling: I as a user submit a report and that's it - then I have to wait until I get a notification when it's closed. But why can't I have another UCP module which lists all reports created by me, including their status (open/closed)? If I submitted...
- Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:47 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: [3.3.x][Feature] Topic description
- Replies: 42
- Views: 45307
Re: [3.3.x][Feature] Topic description
On a picture board I administer such a topic description is at max 255 characters long and used in this way: Subject: Milla Jovovich (51 x) Description: "Resident Evil: The Final Chapter" premiere, Roppongi Hills (六本木ヒルズ), Minato (港区), Tokyo (東京都), 13, JP, 2016-12-13 Text: (the pictures only) And th...
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 7:36 am
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: PM System
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5817
Re: PM System
Excellent - you won't see me coming on my bicycle with my knife collection on the rack.
@david63: please change the subject of your post into something like "PM surveillance", as that is more precise to what this topic is about. I, too, expected everything but this.
- Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:37 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: What can you say about Flarum?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 26759
Re: What can you say about Flarum?
difference between "Best viewed with *browser*" and "Best viewed with *technology*" That would also mean HTML versus Flash and Silverlight , which we also experienced in the last 15 years with all its advantages and disadvantages. But I wasn't talking about that - if you really want to go there we ...
- Thu Nov 12, 2015 12:20 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: What can you say about Flarum?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 26759
Re: What can you say about Flarum?
That has nothing to do with Flarum . But to give you the response you're hoping for: it's just rephrasing the " this website is best viewed with/optimized for " which was bad practice 15 years ago already. Don't know why a website must fail because of either missing JS or unhandled JS exceptions - a...
- Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:23 am
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: What can you say about Flarum?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 26759
Re: What can you say about Flarum?
Check their website for more information: flarum.org That's a domain only, hence nothing to click at. Nowadays you never know if a site only supports HTTP or only HTTPS, so it's more vital than ever to provide an URI, like http://flarum.org or https://discuss.flarum.org instead of letting every use...
- Fri Nov 06, 2015 9:06 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Ajax Live Search
- Replies: 6
- Views: 10456
Re: [RFC] Ajax Live Search
current search system is unable to find certain keywords Then a live search would not help either. I modified my board to at least inform the user which stopwords he encountered instead of just giving a generic failure message. It would be more a help to make users aware of what keywords are, what ...
- Sun Nov 01, 2015 9:19 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Tickets Discussion
- Topic: PHPBB3-13933 - Update tokens' definitions in acp_bbcodes
- Replies: 5
- Views: 16443
Re: PHPBB3-13933 - Update tokens' definitions in acp_bbcodes
You can use the regexp directly in the definition. Here's an example of a definition and two functionally equivalent replacements: [div style={REGEXP=/^[a-zA-Z0-9-+.,_ :;#%]+$/}]{TEXT}[/div] <div style="{REGEXP}">{TEXT}</div> Looks great for flexibility. And I hope it's easy to also allow subpatter...