Development Discussion Board

TC wrote:i'm pro- quick reply, and will add a mod. don't know where the anti- quick reply feelings come from. just my 2¢

I'm for togglable quickreply. Just my 2¢.

Peter M Dodge wrote:TFX is starting to sound like a politician 8O

Not quite... no self-serving blatent lies yet.... at least that I know of...

Someone suggested here that Mozilla Spelling could be used in phpBB. How is that?

And whose fault is that, Roberdin?

Yes, the phpBB ACP in 2.0.x has problems, but I'm not complaining as I don't find them large enough to go and fix myself... I can still use the thing, so I'm happy. Don't go there too often anyway...

Yeah, I know its AOL, I would think you'd have a way around that by now... Since when is it their responsibility to work around the immense stupidity of others (AOL)? Remember that to a large degree, the entire development of phpBB is done pro bono, and they can quit at anytime. In light of that, I ...

Strange, phpBB2.1 works well enough to bash it, it seems. Besides, why hang here if you don't like it? Oh, and Roberdin, why assume a preexisting method of user suicide? Wouldn't it be more like an interface that exposes the kill(User victim) method?

jEdit. I swear by it. Yeah, it has problems, but I like it.

JAMMAN wrote:Hmmmm....... (opens up favorite text editor) 8)

Which is? (/me likes jEdit... no link here as it isn't spamming.)

dhn wrote:...not allowed in signatures...

Says he who has a link and an image in their sig... not that I care, I just find this amusing.