Itunes users usually don't know much (no ofence there) being babysat by a corporation tends to do that to ppl.
[...]
(don;t try to offend ppl but would really hope you think about all that APPLE BS we have been submitted over the IFAD because pretty soon you'll see more and more business taking the ...
Search found 1478 matches
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:49 pm
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: Media Players
- Replies: 55
- Views: 118543
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:44 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: Hide Reply and New button to visitors
- Replies: 6
- Views: 22507
Re: Hide Reply and New button to visitors
When a user is logged-in, his permissions are known, so if he cannot reply, there is no point in showing him the Reply button.
However, sometimes users are accidentally logged-out, or do not bother to log-in. In this case, it can be frustrating to be looking for a button that is normally there, but ...
However, sometimes users are accidentally logged-out, or do not bother to log-in. In this case, it can be frustrating to be looking for a button that is normally there, but ...
- Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:39 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: link rel="canonical"
- Replies: 6
- Views: 64775
Re: link rel="canonical"
Bots should only see one URI to each page already, right?
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:35 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Why does phpBB end documents with ?> ?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8750
Re: Why does phpBB end documents with ?> ?
It is a convention recommended by Zend, more than anyone else; in fact, it was questioned in the Zend Certified Engineer mock exams. (I'm not contractually allowed to tell you if it was in the real exam or not. ;)) I suspect this is because Zend are used to dealing with the very large, business ...
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:08 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: phpBB 3.1 REV 9914 works nicely
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15980
Re: phpBB 3.1 REV 9914 works nicely
lawl.
Fails with MSSQL and gives me lots of phpBB debug notices. I think it might be my installation, though.
Fails with MSSQL and gives me lots of phpBB debug notices. I think it might be my installation, though.
- Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:52 am
- Forum: Chit Chat
- Topic: phpbb.com down?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 11511
Re: phpbb.com down?
Yup it appears to be down for me. No need to prove it
- Sun Aug 02, 2009 6:51 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] Discussion
- Topic: Why does phpBB end documents with ?> ?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8750
Why does phpBB end documents with ?> ?
I recently discovered that, in documents that only contain PHP, it is not only syntactically valid -- but recommended that the document not close with ?>. This is of course normally required to terminate a code block, but allowed here precisely because some editors throw in additional new lines ...
- Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:56 am
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: QR in current SVN
- Replies: 20
- Views: 50845
Re: QR in current SVN
Which is where consistent UI design comes in, features that are not enabled board wide that have dependencies or switches at a lower level should reflect the status, i.e. be grayed out or not displayed at all. I don't believe that is helpful at all. If a setting is greyed-out or simply not there ...
- Fri Jul 31, 2009 1:05 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: QR in current SVN
- Replies: 20
- Views: 50845
Re: QR in current SVN
Allow quick reply:
This setting defines if quick reply is enabled or not. If this setting is enabled, forums need to have their quick reply option enabled too.
Who says that this language string is final? (Maybe it is, I don't know, but it's only in the SVN so far, right?)
Just as an aside, and I ...
This setting defines if quick reply is enabled or not. If this setting is enabled, forums need to have their quick reply option enabled too.
Who says that this language string is final? (Maybe it is, I don't know, but it's only in the SVN so far, right?)
Just as an aside, and I ...
- Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:39 pm
- Forum: [3.0/Olympus] New features discussion
- Topic: QR in current SVN
- Replies: 20
- Views: 50845
Re: QR in current SVN
Like in your other topic, we all understand perfectly what you are trying to say. We simply disagree with your interpretation. That doesn't mean the team's argument is "flawed".