Development Discussion Board

With modern computers and a few indices, it takes about 0.001 seconds to scan through a few million rows .

Why don't they just use the TIMESTAMP column type? It's the easiest.. and times are in a simple to read manner:
20040828125323 would be the timestamp on my computer right now .

Thats:
YYYYMMDDhhmmss

There is a simple workaround for IE using a DX rendering method.

http://webfx.eae.net/dhtml/pngbehavior/pngbehavior.html" target="_blank

(if you apply that workaround, it's a good idea to remove the size of the image and just change "scale" in the filter to "image.")

but if you really really ...

Instead of complaining, this is why they a) invented Object-Oriented Programming (blackbox everything, makes it easy to maintain a program too), and b) functions. Instead of putting everything into one PHP script and using conditional statements, have the functions control everything (functions that ...

Is this supposed to be some kind of a joke? A few thousand entries is nothing to a modern computer, and especially to a modern RDBMS. Even if it gets to a million entries, the phpBB2.2 team will still be able to keep queries down to a few milliseconds by using indices.

Perhaps your worries are ...

Hmm, I have nested categories in 2.1.2 and it doesn't look like the second picture at all. I have to click on the subcategory to see just one level of categories/forums. What gives?

Excellent feature! However I fear there is one problem with it.

When we are using this feature, would it be possible to make it so that a "category" actually acts like a "category" (just like root categories show the categories' forums and the descriptions) so that when a subforum appears in the ...

What kind of a question is this? Admins have levels now, you can restrict them so they can or cannot enter passworded forums

But the biggest question is.. why doesn't the PM system work, it's the only thing stopping me from using 2.2 in a real environment

Ar, what bothers me the most is that some things are deliberately left unfinished like searching and PMs. Why couldn't we go feature-by-feature instead of implementing a whole bunch of features that don't work? :(

So when are we going to see a beta with features that work anyways, this summer I ...