Possibly a bit of an ocd question but are there plans to fix any current css errors before the stable release?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/vali ... Findex.php
FYI I just updated 3 testforums to RC4 and they all show the exact same errors.
Search found 16 matches
- Tue Sep 23, 2014 2:41 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: css errors
- Replies: 8
- Views: 16988
- Thu Jul 03, 2014 10:02 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Modern profile fields in 3.1
- Replies: 83
- Views: 257123
- Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:39 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Modern profile fields in 3.1
- Replies: 83
- Views: 257123
Re: [RFC] Modern profile fields in 3.1
Can you at least remove the field from the UCP if Jabber is disabled in the ACP?nickvergessen wrote:Jabber is still hardcoded as it is also available as a notification method. So it's not that easy to move it to a custom profile field.
- Thu Jan 26, 2012 8:21 pm
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Merge style components
- Replies: 27
- Views: 64415
Re: [RFC] Merge style components
Most of my extra styles only have a theme folder and an imageset, using the template of subsilver2.Arty wrote:What components are you mixing?marian0810 wrote:I actually use that a lot
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:41 am
- Forum: [3.1/Ascraeus] Merged RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Merged] Merge style components
- Replies: 27
- Views: 64415
Re: [RFC] Merge style components
I actually use that a lotMighty Gorgon wrote:I don't think there are so many users mixing up styles components to get new styles.
- Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:24 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: really good idea: mod list
- Replies: 11
- Views: 19067
Re: really good idea: mod list
So if we want the list we're obliged to use automod? But I like modding...keith10456 wrote:But what about the admins that don't use Automod?
- Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:33 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 450105
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
I can definitely live with it, especially if the issues with prosilver will be solvednaderman wrote:So can I assume that those who spoke out against removing subsilver2 can live with this alternative proposed solution?
- Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:57 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Change "less than a minute ago" to something shorter
- Replies: 16
- Views: 35845
Re: Change "less than a minute ago" to something shorter
I want to have the Today and Tomorrow part and not the 'xxx minutes ago' part, but there didn't seem to be an option for that. Great idea to make one
- Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:23 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Change "less than a minute ago" to something shorter
- Replies: 16
- Views: 35845
Re: Change "less than a minute ago" to something shorter
It would also be nice if there was an option to turn this off. I very much prefer it the way it was before 3.0.4 so atm I just comment out those lines in session.php.
- Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:47 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Rejected RFCs
- Topic: [RFC|Rejected] Removal of subsilver2
- Replies: 238
- Views: 450105
Re: [RFC|Accepted] Removal of subsilver2
There is a difference between giving support and allowing support.
Apparently not for phpBB2, I just don't get why is this any different.
Besides that, giving support in a topic to a user with a problem is completely different from supporting something in a standard package and providing code ...
Apparently not for phpBB2, I just don't get why is this any different.
Besides that, giving support in a topic to a user with a problem is completely different from supporting something in a standard package and providing code ...