Development Discussion Board

Very good idea... comes in handy when updating the board, or migrating from host, the board is still online and people can read:)

EDIT: I think CKEditor is ugly, though :-(

http://www.kunstmaan.be/blog/2012/01/03/bootstrapck-skin-for-ckeditor/

Try this nice skin :)
That isn't bad. I don't like the massive amount of buttons it has, and I can't see the point in the top row of them.

they just enabled the full editor to ...

callumacrae wrote:EDIT: I think CKEditor is ugly, though

http://www.kunstmaan.be/blog/2012/01/03 ... -ckeditor/

Try this nice skin

I couldn't agree more. This needs to be added and I really hope it is. The Warning system is so primitive and the few MODs that relate to the warning system are not that helpful. There should be a much more intricate system developed.

The same goes for me.

Maybe we should put together some money ...

I will hopefully try and make a mod for an improved warning system, hopefully could then be included in 3.2 .

make one for 3.1.0, 3.2.0 is a long way! :D
3.1.x is feature frozen so this won't be included before 3.2.0.

Erik, if you look at his post, you see he mentions a mod, not a part of the ...

Nelsaidi wrote:I will hopefully try and make a mod for an improved warning system, hopefully could then be included in 3.2 .

make one for 3.1.0, 3.2.0 is a long way!

ameeck wrote:Search engines don't use the keywords meta tag anymore (like a couple of years now). Do you have an opposite experience with a site?

Yes they still use it, but there not that important like a few years ago, the description tag is more of use then the keywords, the same for the page title...

Sounds like your Anti-Spam ACP mod, to bad it is not a part of the core, it helpt me allot with bad users and spammers...

so vote +1

The Wizard wrote:a warning system like ipb would be nice.

Example?

EXreaction wrote:3.1 is now feature frozen, if anything it would have to wait for 3.2 (it is probably a good idea for something like this however).

If you would like me to I can move the topic to 3.2 discussion.

I know it's feature frozen now, but your free to move it to the 3.2 discussion, it's worth a shot