viewtopic.php?f=81&t=32769
And agree
Search found 122 matches
- Mon May 02, 2011 12:54 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Create a new user account through the ACP
- Replies: 40
- Views: 120453
- Thu Jan 20, 2011 5:33 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC]Topic System
- Replies: 13
- Views: 27712
Re: [RFC]Topic System
The fact every browser has plugins for such a thing is a reason not too, implementing it means you have to deal with providing right spelling (not easy or even free), for every language. Spell checking is something a user does themselves if they want.
- Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:29 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] MediaWiki-like Diff Engine for Posts
- Replies: 5
- Views: 18927
Re: [RFC] MediaWiki-like Diff Engine for Posts
Soft delete will be included in phpBB3.1 (which is basically delete a topic but its simply hidden, then a hard delete permisions to permanently remove it)
It does sound good and is useful, if automatically deleted after X days then database size increases could be managed.
It does sound good and is useful, if automatically deleted after X days then database size increases could be managed.
- Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:15 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: WYSIWYG editor
- Replies: 104
- Views: 241207
Re: WYSIWYG editor
Not trying to be rude or anything, but you didnt make the WYSIWYG editor (the tinyMCE team did) you simply implemented it into phpBB, and I'm pretty sure the phpBB team too could have done it in 3 weeks if they wanted to - but software development has abit more to it that "ok lets do this", studying ...
- Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:00 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: WYSIWYG editor
- Replies: 104
- Views: 241207
Re: WYSIWYG editor
My post was you wont submit it because its not you who made it, but whatever
Regardless as to whoever made it ...
it is prone to XSS and you allow pretty much unfiltered HTML to be posted.
Regardless as to whoever made it ...
it is prone to XSS and you allow pretty much unfiltered HTML to be posted.
- Fri Dec 10, 2010 4:25 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: WYSIWYG editor
- Replies: 104
- Views: 241207
Re: WYSIWYG editor
finally my work is done.
i complete my project means: Tinymce WYSIWYG for phpBB its working very good with phpBB 3.0.8.
for some reason i dont want to publish in phpbb.com but i can give it to development team if wants to add in phpBB ( 3.1 or 3.2 ). :D
http://startrekguide.com/community ...
i complete my project means: Tinymce WYSIWYG for phpBB its working very good with phpBB 3.0.8.
for some reason i dont want to publish in phpbb.com but i can give it to development team if wants to add in phpBB ( 3.1 or 3.2 ). :D
http://startrekguide.com/community ...
- Mon Nov 22, 2010 11:22 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Infractions System
- Replies: 4
- Views: 14878
Re: [RFC] Infractions System
I've started work on this as a mod, I'll keep this thread/the SVN updated as progress goes along, and if I have to stop for whatever reasons. - I'll put any notes/outcomes of research also on the SVN (link coming soon)
- Tue Nov 02, 2010 5:38 pm
- Forum: [3.x] Discussion
- Topic: Sub-Sub-Sub forums and Categories like CH for phpbb2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 12774
Re: Sub-Sub-Sub forums and Categories like CH for phpbb2
The only thing I'm not too happy about is:
Assume forum structure Forum A -> Subforum B
If user has view permisions for subforum B but not forum A, then the only way they can access it is via a direct link
This does make permissions abit more of a hassle, the only issue is showing that a forum ...
Assume forum structure Forum A -> Subforum B
If user has view permisions for subforum B but not forum A, then the only way they can access it is via a direct link
This does make permissions abit more of a hassle, the only issue is showing that a forum ...
- Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:43 am
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Autosave
- Replies: 28
- Views: 51530
Re: [RFC] Autosave
I remember a post about using local storage - RFC somewhere, had some good points about autosaving, how it would work, downsides, etc etc.
An outcome of that I remember was that if the post didnt submit due to server error, chances are it wouldnt have saved a draft either.
My reasoning for saying ...
An outcome of that I remember was that if the post didnt submit due to server error, chances are it wouldnt have saved a draft either.
My reasoning for saying ...
- Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:45 pm
- Forum: [3.x][Archive] RFCs
- Topic: [RFC] Autosave
- Replies: 28
- Views: 51530
Re: [RFC] Autosave
It would put an immense load on the database and the server, it is better suited as a mod for boards who need it and have the computing power to serve it.